2025-12-31 06:25:31

BTTC's performance in 2025 has been remarkable. This year, cross-chain transaction volume surpassed $1.63 billion, completing over 10,000 transactions. In terms of network distribution, the TRON ecosystem contributed 918 million, followed by Ethereum with 693 million, and BSC contributed 20.3 million.

The strength of this architecture lies in — being designed specifically for high-efficiency cross-chain operations. Its underlying design is meant to accommodate massive liquidity and is now widely adopted by many AI-native assets. Simply put, it solves the pain points of asset transfer in the multi-chain era, allowing billions of dollars in funds to flow smoothly.

ETH-0,16%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

zkProofInThePudding

· 9h ago

$1.63 billion in trading volume looks quite substantial, but why does it feel like TRON is just hyping itself again? BTTC indeed solves some pain points, but the ecosystem still feels a bit cold. Cross-chain is essentially a liquidity competition—who has more assets wins. Are native AI assets widely adopted? Or are only a few top players using them? BSC only has 20.3 million, haha, it seems not everyone trusts it. This 1.63 billion is still a bit small; comparing with other cross-chain solutions makes it clear. By the way, TRON contributed 918 million, which accounts for more than half—how much does it rely on its ecosystem?

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 9h ago

I have to say, TRON really carried this wave, with 9.18 billion accounting for nearly 56%, while other chains have to step aside. 16.3 billion? Sounds huge, but when distributed across various chains, it's just so-so. The true activity level still depends on TRON. The ability to run 10,000 cross-chain transactions indicates that people are indeed using it, but I don't know how many are just for volume. No matter how advanced the underlying design is, someone has to pay the bill. Using AI assets ≠ genuine demand, so we need to watch the subsequent data. BTTC's architecture sounds good, but compared to those proper cross-chain solutions, it's still a bit lacking. Billions of funds flowing smoothly? Uh... what about transaction fees? Gas fees? That's the real key. The data looks impressive, but whether it can be sustained is the real test. Don't let it become a flash in the pan again. The TRON ecosystem is strong, but the volume on other chains really can't move the scene. This efficiency is real, but risks also need to be considered. Multi-chain liquidity isn't necessarily a good thing. 16.3 billion sounds great, but on average, each transaction is only 1.6 million. The transaction volume coverage is limited.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSurvivor

· 9h ago

16.3 billion in trading volume sounds impressive, but TRON accounts for more than half. Can it really rely on this long-term? If you ask me, cross-chain technology is the next big trend. As long as it doesn't frequently encounter issues, there's potential. TRON's ecosystem is so strong, but it seems BSC is falling behind... Using this architecture for AI-native assets, honestly, it's just another hype concept. Billions of dollars flowing smoothly? Just listen, you'll only know when you actually try. Is the data from BTTC this time really reliable? It feels like similar projects were hyped up like this last year. Cross-chain solutions to multi-chain pain points... so far, it's just average; centralized exchanges are still more convenient. 10,000 transactions spread over a year isn't that much. No matter how advanced the underlying design is, it can't withstand the market's lack of recognition.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 9h ago

$1.63 billion, sounds pretty good, but TRON took the biggest share. What's the plan here? Cross-chain is indeed competitive with BTTC, but whether it can handle the subsequent volume remains to be seen. Are all AI assets being used? That depends on whether the liquidity is genuine or not. It's again designed for high efficiency. After hearing it so many times, I just want to see how stable it can actually run. The share of BSC is indeed a bit modest; it seems ETH and TRON are still the main players. $1.63 billion at first glance seems like a lot, but when divided over 10,000 transactions, it's not that outrageous. New cross-chain infrastructure, I hear it every time and feel there's a lot of hype, but this time the data actually seems solid. In the multi-chain era, you need a good transfer hub. BTTC's architecture and concept really solve the problem.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 9h ago

16.3 billion in trading volume sounds impressive, but with TRON's large share, isn't the market too centralized? --- Cross-chain technology is essentially about solving liquidity fragmentation. The BTTC architecture indeed has some real substance. --- Smoothly handling billions in capital flow? That depends on the actual user experience; good data doesn't necessarily mean it's user-friendly. --- The term "AI-native assets" is quite new. Can you specify which projects you're referring to, or is it just a passing remark? --- 10,000 transactions spread over a year isn't that frequent. How does it compare to other cross-chain solutions? --- The pain points of the multi-chain era do exist, but whether BTTC can truly solve them depends on long-term data. --- Ethereum contributes 6.93 billion. What does this ratio imply? Do users still trust ETH more?

View OriginalReply0