Recently, I looked into the activity of AI agents on the blockchain, and it’s quite interesting.
Data from the first quarter of this year shows that these autonomous AI systems on the blockchain are booming. On Fetch.ai’s Agentverse platform, there are 150,000 autonomous agents running, with a total transaction volume of up to $780 million in the quarter. Meanwhile, SingularityNET’s AI service marketplace is even more impressive, with monthly call volumes reaching 8 billion, and monthly revenue hitting $45 million. Bittensor is also not to be outdone, with the number of subnets expanding to 128, covering cutting-edge fields like protein design and code generation.
Overall, the GDP (total transaction value) of AI agents grew by 400% this quarter, reaching a scale of $2.5 billion. This growth rate is indeed quite rapid.
However, behind the boom, there are also concerns. For example, who is responsible if a transaction executed by an agent encounters issues, how to align the agent’s value objectives without deviation, and whether the market could be manipulated by agent strategies—all these questions still lack clear answers. This is also why, although the prospects in this field are promising, regulatory discussions are heating up.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldFarmRefugee
· 19h ago
A 400% increase is really impressive, but if these agents have issues, who will take the blame?
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 20h ago
A 400% increase is really impressive, but honestly, these numbers look a bit suspicious...
Who's taking responsibility for this? Did the agents mess up?
AI running on the chain so actively, regulators must be losing sleep over this.
Are those 150,000 Fetch agents really active, or are they just a pile of zombie accounts?
SingularityNET's monthly revenue of 45 million, is this really not a bubble?
The problem is, these agents themselves have no balance sheets, so how can accountability be enforced?
Can the 128 subnets of Bittensor truly generate value, or are they all just cutting each other’s leeks?
This growth rate is too strange; we need to see if there's self-trading behind the scenes to inflate the volume.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 20h ago
A 400% growth rate sounds great, but who will take the blame? When agents make mistakes, should it be blamed on the protocol or the users? No one has dared to speak openly about this issue.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 20h ago
A 400% growth rate sounds great, but who will clean up after these AI agents... What happens if something really goes wrong?
Recently, I looked into the activity of AI agents on the blockchain, and it’s quite interesting.
Data from the first quarter of this year shows that these autonomous AI systems on the blockchain are booming. On Fetch.ai’s Agentverse platform, there are 150,000 autonomous agents running, with a total transaction volume of up to $780 million in the quarter. Meanwhile, SingularityNET’s AI service marketplace is even more impressive, with monthly call volumes reaching 8 billion, and monthly revenue hitting $45 million. Bittensor is also not to be outdone, with the number of subnets expanding to 128, covering cutting-edge fields like protein design and code generation.
Overall, the GDP (total transaction value) of AI agents grew by 400% this quarter, reaching a scale of $2.5 billion. This growth rate is indeed quite rapid.
However, behind the boom, there are also concerns. For example, who is responsible if a transaction executed by an agent encounters issues, how to align the agent’s value objectives without deviation, and whether the market could be manipulated by agent strategies—all these questions still lack clear answers. This is also why, although the prospects in this field are promising, regulatory discussions are heating up.