#预测市场 This wave of major projects during the weekly cycle is indeed aggressive. Upheaval, Yield Basis, Tea, Limitless, Goated… the concentrated burst seems to be a market test of who truly has the patience to build good products and who is just chasing stories.

Looking closely at these projects, I am particularly interested in their respective cash flow expectations and ecological carrying capacity. Upheaval's Bonding Curve presale mechanism is quite interesting; raising 870% over the target indicates strong market enthusiasm. However, the key is whether trading volume can be sustained after launch—this directly affects the long-term value of the token. Yield Basis, backed by the Curve ecosystem and Egorov's credit endorsement, has a financing valuation of 50 million but is expected by the market to have a market cap in the hundreds of millions. This gap itself highlights the risk and reward trade-off.

In comparison, Goated's logic is the most straightforward—already with 1 billion in betting volume and stable cash flow. Products like this usually don't lack reasons to issue tokens, and with real income data as support, their post-launch performance is more predictable.

But I have to be honest, this wave of projects is too dense. From a follow-up perspective, how players with different risk preferences should allocate their positions is the key. Aggressive investors can take small bets on high-heat, high-uncertainty projects like Upheaval; more conservative ones might prefer to wait for projects like Yield Basis or Goated, which have solid fundamentals, and then follow up when the opportunity arises. I am still observing the market predictions; I will wait until specific subscription information is released.

The key is not to get carried away by the hype—each project's background and details need to be thoroughly reviewed.