Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
There is a reliable rumor circulating in the industry — the core development team behind NetEase's "Land of Glory" is partnering with Korea's NEXUS to launch a blockchain SLG game next year.
You know "Land of Glory," right? This game has accumulated revenue of 18 billion. What does that indicate? It shows that the team knows how to create depth in SLG games, emphasizing strategy and long-term operation. This time, they plan to bring this concept onto the blockchain, integrating asset trading and Token economy systems. NEXUS is responsible for providing the underlying blockchain technology support.
Why is this worth paying attention to? SLG games are naturally suited for on-chain economies. Traditional SLG games already handle a large amount of economic data, and the demand for circulation of encrypted assets exists inherently. In theory, this type of game could break the curse in the blockchain gaming circle — "only trading tokens without real gameplay." Truly integrating traditional deep gameplay with on-chain economic systems might attract hundreds of thousands, even millions of traditional players.
Question for everyone: Are people still paying attention to the blockchain gaming track? What do you think — can the involvement of major traditional game companies truly revitalize this ecosystem?
---
Wait, is NEXUS reliable? This detail could determine success or failure.
---
Honestly, blockchain games have been a cutthroat market for the past few years, but SLG games are naturally compatible. Let's see how they play.
---
The core issue is whether they can retain traditional players; if the token price crashes, the gaming experience will be gone.
---
The NetEase team’s execution is there, but the pitfalls of blockchain games are numerous. I remain cautious.
---
It feels more like big companies testing the waters; the real opportunity might come after they explore further.
---
Breaking the curse of "only trading coins without real gameplay"? That's too optimistic, haha. Let’s see how it goes.
To be honest, I've been tired of blockchain games for a long time, they're all just schemes to cut leeks. But the people at NetEase are different; they understand what true game design is.
Wait, could this be another false hope? Anyway, I remain skeptical.
But 18 billion... if they can really replicate it on the chain, it might change the game + encryption landscape. I'm a bit looking forward to seeing how they do it.
Hey, what exactly is NEXUS? Is it reliable? That's the key.
Honestly, I haven't really played most blockchain games before; they were mostly Ponzi schemes. But this news has made me somewhat interested in paying attention.
Deep SLG + token economy, the theoretical framework is solid, it all depends on whether NEXUS's underlying technology can hold up.
If they can truly attract traditional players, blockchain games might have found their direction.
Let's see if they can really pull it off; for now, it's just rumors, no point in speculating.
Hmm, if they can truly avoid the trap of speculative trading, that would be interesting. But honestly, I don't quite believe it; the Token economy is too complex.
Moving the operation system of Rate Earth to the blockchain? Sounds ideal, but in practice, all kinds of issues are waiting to happen.
Let's wait until next year; there's no rush for this right now.
Wow, NEXUS from Korea? The lineup looks quite sincere. But how big the pitfalls are, we'll only know once the product is out.
No matter how much you talk about blockchain games, if there's no truly fun core, no matter how fancy the Token is, it's useless.
I just want to see how they handle inflation—that's the core challenge for SLG blockchain games.
Wait, a team with 18 billion in revenue working on blockchain games, NEXUS technology support... this setup is impressive
Honestly, blockchain games have been just pure money grabs before, can this be reliable now?
A project at the level of 18 billion, even if it's bad, it won't be that bad
Traditional games with deep Token economics sound much more reliable than those broken contract games
Launching next year, keeping an eye on it, feels like a real opportunity for blockchain games
If it succeeds, millions of players flooding into the blockchain game ecosystem wouldn't be a dream
But as always, there are too many blockchain game graveyards, let's wait and see
---
180 billion in revenue is indeed impressive, but the坑 of blockchain games is too deep. Aren't there many predecessors dying on the beach?
---
Honestly, is NEXUS a reliable company? I haven't heard of it.
---
It's about integration and breaking curses again. Every time it's said like this, but why haven't we seen a real hit yet?
---
I've hyped it up so many times, but let's wait until the product comes out. Anyway, I have no hope anymore.
---
If NetEase's team could really do well with blockchain games, they would have done it long ago. What does it mean that they are now going solo?
---
Million-level players? Are you sure it's not just million-level FOMO retail investors, haha?
---
SLG indeed has an economic foundation, but the key is still the Token model design; otherwise, it will be as cold as Axie.
---
Again fusion, again breaking curses, they all sound great, but I wonder if in the end it will still turn into another "play and earn" routine.
---
I respect the 18 billion team, but I have to question the Korea partnership part. Will the review and policies... really go smoothly?
---
Basically, it depends on the data. Whether it can truly attract traditional players will only be known after launch. Right now, all the hype is empty talk.
---
Haha, the biggest problem with chain games isn't that no one is making them, but that no one wants to play them. Is this really different this time?
---
SLG is naturally suitable? But the problem is, crypto players and traditional players are on completely different wavelengths. Integration isn't that simple.
---
I just want to know when it will launch. Is there a real demo? Otherwise, it's all just talk.
---
NetEase's industrialization capability on the chain does have imagination, but how many tears have been shed in this track already...
With 18 billion in revenue speaking, these folks really understand economic system design, unlike those projects that just cut the leeks.
Let's wait and see. There are too many promising projects, but only a few will truly survive.
---
Honestly, I'm already numb to blockchain games. Whether it can truly take off depends on how they proceed next.
---
Deep gameplay plus Token economy... sounds good, but I hope it doesn't turn into another Battle Royale.
---
The NetEase team is reliable, but I'm worried about it being ruined by capital. It depends on who the investors are.
---
Wait, is NEXUS trustworthy? I don't quite understand this cooperation method.
---
Millions of players entering? Dream on haha. First, get the no-slicing-leeks thing right.
---
SLG is naturally suitable for blockchain games, but only if it really makes money; otherwise, it's just empty talk.
---
Next year? Again, next year. Let's wait and see.
---
If this time they can truly break the curse of "only trading coins without real gameplay," I’ll believe it. So far, no one in the blockchain game circle has done that.
---
The Luotu IP indeed has a solid foundation, but the key is whether it can retain that deep strategic feel after going on-chain.