This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecorder
· 5h ago
It's the same transparency approach again—sounds great in theory, but what about in practice? On-chain data is accessible to everyone, but the problem is most people simply can't understand it.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 5h ago
It sounds good, but in reality, most DAOs have no motivation to truly become transparent.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 5h ago
Sounds good, but the key question is whether anyone will actually act based on on-chain data or if it will just become another piece of paper.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 5h ago
honestly? algorithmically verifiable governance is just monitoring mempool patterns but for dao decisions... finally someone gets it
Reply0
orphaned_block
· 6h ago
It sounds good, but the key is whether anyone actually checks. Most people just stake tokens and then ignore them.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 6h ago
Sounds good, but how does it work in practice? How many people need to participate in verification to ensure there are no issues?
DAO治理常常卡在两个死穴上——提案永远吵不完,执行结果也没人能真正验证。这谁都知道,但怎么解?
有个思路是用算法把治理执行透明化。把治理决策的每一步——实施效果、资金流向、承诺进度——都放到网络上实时可验证。这样做的好处是什么?问责制有了着落。之前那种"决议通过了,然后呢?"的尴尬局面就能避免。基于算法的治理才能真正站得住脚。
这套系统里,代币起了双重作用。一个是充当验证燃料——用它来驱动整个验证过程;另一个是充当网络保险——质押它来保障治理网络的安全。随着算法治理逐步从概念走向实践,对可信验证的需求会越来越大。这个需求反过来就会推动代币价值的释放。
说实话,这不是什么激进的想法,就是把"信任"这个东西从口头承诺变成可以被检验的东西。谁都可以查,谁都可以审计。这对想要落地的DAO治理来说,可能是个关键的一步。