2025-12-26 12:22:07

Recently, many tokens in the BSC ecosystem have indeed entered a period of adjustment. This is not hard to understand — given the current market environment, it is a very normal phenomenon.

The core issue lies in liquidity. Funds are clearly shrinking and continuously being drawn away by new hot targets, causing a number of community-driven projects to experience "funds transfer." During such a phase, a weakening price trend is almost inevitable and does not mean that a project has suddenly become worse.

But there is a more noteworthy point: when a project is "neglected" or ignored, has the community really dispersed? This is the real dividing line.

Currently, people are still here, and things are still progressing. This already indicates the problem. Taking it slow is actually okay; the key is to hold the formation. Communities that can endure during a bear market often have stronger rebound potential in the next round of market cycles.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiTooHigh

· 7h ago

Basically, it's about squeezing out the water content; what's left are true believers.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 8h ago

Liquidity contraction—I'm tired of hearing this rhetoric. The real question is, who is actually holding the line? Stay optimistic about those still working; low prices are actually an opportunity. As long as the community stays united, that's what matters. Projects on BSC that can hold up during this wave will surge strongly next round. Wait, this logic also applies to other tracks, right? Holding on to bounce back? Then why haven't we seen many actual rebounds?

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 8h ago

Liquidity draining at this stage is indeed about filtering out who truly believes and who is just following the hype. An RSI pullback does not mean the project is dead; understanding this logic is crucial. The community is still active, and when the next launch window arrives, the rebound angle coefficient will be very strong. Historical data shows that this is how it works. A depressed price does not equal a fundamental collapse; many people have misunderstood this.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 8h ago

liquidity drain is just darwinian selection tbh. the projects that keep shipping through the noise? those are the ones with actual incentive alignment. tokenomics design matters way more than price action rn

Reply0

quiet_lurker

· 8h ago

Liquidity transfer indeed is the first thing retail investors feel. But honestly, seeing the community still active makes me feel much more at ease. Many projects start to panic when their prices drop, but actually they just haven't understood this point. In a bear market, it's never technology that gets eliminated, but those whose morale collapses. Keeping the team together is more important than anything else. The difference during the next rebound will be huge. Wait, how many actually stick to it? I feel like many are secretly running away. Weak prices are not scary; a community collapse is the real disaster. This logic makes sense, but when will the current wave of capital contraction ease up? Feels like we have to wait a bit longer.

View OriginalReply0

NestedFox

· 8h ago

Alright, I agree with this point. When liquidity tightens, various projects lose value; it's really just funds seeking new outlets. There's no need to be overly pessimistic. The key is who can hold on; communities that stick through the bear market are indeed more resilient.

View OriginalReply0