I recently finished a deep conversation about StandX, and what impressed me the most was the team's understanding of the product.



The entire conversation was straightforward, without lengthy background introductions or pleasantries, directly diving into the product logic. A detail mentioned by AG is particularly worth noting — StandX did not treat the yield-bearing stablecoin DUSD and Perps DEX as two separate functions from the start, but designed them as a complete ecosystem.

This approach is quite interesting. Most projects start with a main product and then gradually add peripheral features. But here, they flipped the process — during the design phase, they clearly considered the interaction logic between DUSD and Perp trading — stablecoins carry liquidity, DEX handles trading needs, and the two modules empower each other. This holistic design directly impacts subsequent product iterations and user experience.

Building the product based on actual trading needs rather than first developing a technical solution and then finding application scenarios is still relatively rare in DeFi innovation projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MercilessHalalvip
· 20h ago
Hmm, this approach is indeed reversed and not very common. Stablecoins + DEX integration may seem unoriginal, but truly connecting these two areas... is difficult.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 12-26 10:53
Ha, this is the proper approach to product development. Most projects are still patching features together. Integrated ecosystem design is really much better than patching later. You can see that the team has truly thought it through. Reversing engineering from the requirements to the technology is a great logic, much more reliable than those hyping concepts. I think the combination of DUSD and Perps works well. The liquidity closed-loop can indeed be self-consistent. This wave is not just simple stacking; they are really refining product details.
View OriginalReply0
DataChiefvip
· 12-26 10:53
Yo, this approach is indeed a reverse operation. DUSD and Perps were linked from the start, indicating they didn't intend to cut leeks or do a shell project.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 12-26 10:38
Awesome, this is true product thinking. Most teams are just blindly adding features, directly designing from requirements in reverse, with stablecoins and DEX mutually reinforcing each other. Attention to detail!
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 12-26 10:37
This approach indeed operates in reverse, not following the old-fashioned logic of first technology then application. The ecosystem design of stablecoins + Perps may not seem that complicated, but it is truly scarce.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinkingvip
· 12-26 10:25
Oh, now that's called product thinking, unlike some projects that just brainstorm first and then figure out how to use it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)