AI trustworthiness has recently become a hot topic in this track. Different technical approaches are competing in the market, with Inference Labs and Mira Network often being compared, but their solutions differ quite significantly.



Inference Labs adopts a mathematically rigorous technical approach. They are mainly focused on zero-knowledge machine learning (zkML), with the core logic being to enable verification of AI model reasoning processes through zero-knowledge proof technology while protecting computational privacy. Simply put: AI provides an answer, but you can verify its accuracy without seeing the full algorithm. This approach requires high computational power but achieves a high level of trustworthiness and security.

In contrast, Mira Network employs a different approach. They focus more on distributed computing networks and incentive mechanism design, ensuring the trustworthiness of AI services through network consensus. Both paths aim to solve the core issue of "how to make people trust AI," but their technical stacks and implementation logic are completely different. zkML is more like a mathematical proof, while distributed networks are more like collective endorsement. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, and the market will ultimately determine the better solution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenYieldvip
· 12h ago
zkml sounds elegant on paper until you hit the compute wall—then it becomes a leverage trap waiting to liquidate. consensus-based trust? lol, we've seen how that plays out when incentives misalign.
Reply0
FarmToRichesvip
· 12h ago
zkML sounds impressive, but in reality, how much money would it take to implement? The computing power monster isn't something just anyone can afford.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulledvip
· 12h ago
zkML sounds like it requires a lot of computing power, but it is indeed more hardcore. The distributed side relies on consensus to support it, but it still feels a bit虚 (vague/uncertain).
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 12h ago
zkML那套听起来很猛,就是算力成本要爆表吧
Reply0
Whale_Whisperervip
· 12h ago
zkML is indeed impressive, but can it really be scaled for widespread adoption? The computational cost seems like it could be a trap.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnlyvip
· 12h ago
The zkML setup is indeed solid, but who will cover the computational cost?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)