2025-12-26 10:22:54

Web3社交赛道现在有个有趣的现象——一堆项目看起来在做社交，其实都在复制传统模式那一套。真正有想象力的团队反而在抠细节，琢磨怎么让用户身份跨越不同场景保持连贯性，让内容不会像Web2那样被平台随意处置。这两个问题一旦解决，才算找到了Web3社交的差异化突破口。用户身份的可迁移性和内容的永久性归属，这应该成为新一代社交应用的竞争基准。

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

notSatoshi1971

· 7h ago

To be honest, current Web3 social projects are really just making empty promises. If they can truly make identity portable, that would be a game-changer. Tell me, why are there still so many projects repeating Facebook's old tricks? The selling point of permanent content is good, but how to attract ordinary users is the real issue. The team that focuses on the details really understands Web3; others are just re-skins. Permanent ownership sounds great, but can the infrastructure really support it? This is what Web3 social should look like, not the drama of a certain coin launching and then rugging.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 12-26 10:53

That's right, there are indeed a bunch of projects that are just Web2 with a different skin, which is pointless. The true next step is the portability of identity; whoever solves this first will win. I've been waiting too long for content ownership... Copy-paste social apps are really damn annoying, wake up everyone. This is what Web3 should be doing; everything else is nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 12-26 10:53

Hey, the aspect of identity portability is indeed crucial, but to be honest, this pit is a bit deep. Exactly, right now those projects are just superficial changes, not very interesting. But I do want to see who can really tackle these two challenges; so far, I haven't seen anyone particularly capable. Once identity mobility is improved and permanent content ownership is clarified... that’s the true form of Web3 social interaction. I agree with this viewpoint, but I just worry that the team will eventually start to compromise again, sticking to the old methods to make quick money and keep things simple.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 12-26 10:47

Identity is portable, and content is permanently owned. This is what Web3 social should really be about. Currently, most projects are just shell players, which is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

BlockTalk

· 12-26 10:33

Identity portability and permanent content ownership—these are the real issues; everything else is just slacking off. --- Exactly, true Web3 social networking must break through these two points, otherwise it's no different from traditional platforms. --- Wait, can identity portability really be achieved technically? It feels more difficult than I imagined... --- Many projects are indeed copying and plagiarizing; I'm already exhausted from the aesthetic fatigue, and we still need to wait for those truly smart teams. --- I believe in permanent ownership; it's definitely better than being deleted at any time by platform bosses. --- Alright, I believe it. Whoever figures out these two points first will win. --- Content ownership rights should have been handled this way long ago; I don't know why it took so long for someone to bring it up.

View OriginalReply0

GasDevourer

· 12-26 10:24

Your identity is portable, and your content is permanently yours—that's what Web3 social should look like. Forget about all those copy-pasted ones.

View OriginalReply0