2025-12-25 08:26:19

Here's an idea—rather than piling up technical features, it's better to fundamentally solve users' pain points.

Warden's approach is very interesting. It doesn't focus on "how to make it more high-end," but on "how to make it truly usable." Most projects are optimizing tech stacks and increasing parameter flexibility, but what about users? They are still struggling with chain selection, contract interactions, parameter configurations, and other trivial matters.

Warden takes a different perspective—delegating all these complex operations to the Agent. The user's work is simplified to the extreme: just describe your needs in natural language. Want to do something? Just say it. The system understands the intent and automatically completes the entire process from chain selection and contract invocation to parameter setting.

This is not just UX optimization; to some extent, it is redefining the interaction model of Web3 applications. Making underlying details like chains and contracts truly transparent to users.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 1h ago

Xiongxiong thinks this is the right way. Interacting with natural language is like our DCA regular investment— the simpler it is, the longer it can last.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 14h ago

To be honest, this approach is correct. A bunch of projects boast about flexible parameters and advanced technology every day, but users can't really use them. I think Warden's natural language approach hits the nail on the head; it just needs to make it truly accessible for ordinary people.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFreedom

· 14h ago

To be honest, most projects are competing over technical specifications, and no one is truly considering the user experience. The idea behind Warden is indeed clear-headed. In terms of natural language interaction, this feels like the right path for Web3. Stop with those complicated configurations, it's so annoying. This approach simplifies the underlying complexity, making the user experience enjoyable. The idea is good, but the key is whether the implementation can keep up.

View OriginalReply0

ApeDegen

· 14h ago

Haha, that's right. Finally, someone has figured it out. Most projects are just competing over parameters, no one cares if users can actually use them. The natural language interaction approach should have been done this way long ago. With a proper abstraction layer, the details of the chain are truly hidden. This is probably the hope for mainstream users to adopt Web3. Honestly, I like the idea of Warden. Simple and straightforward, hitting the core. Much more reliable than those boastful black technologies. But the key is how well the Agent understands. What if it misunderstands... Could this become a new bottleneck? There will still be pre-questions, right? Can the experience really be that smooth? This direction is correct; it all depends on execution. If it truly allows beginners to complete operations in one sentence, then it’s a paradigm shift. Thinking back to those flashy projects before, with technology bragging to the sky, but the user experience was a mess. Warden at least chose the right direction.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 14h ago

This is the right way. It's not about stacking parameters but truly making it accessible for beginners. Many projects have overcomplicated things.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 14h ago

Speaking of this idea, it really hits the mark and is much more reliable than projects that constantly boast about how many parameters they have optimized. If this natural language interaction system can truly be implemented, then the mess in mempool can indeed be left to the Agent to handle.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainGriller

· 14h ago

Honestly, this is the approach I want to see. Constantly optimizing parameters and upgrading the tech stack, users simply can't use it at all. It's better to just eliminate the complicated stuff directly. The direction of natural language interaction makes sense; finally, someone understands that the biggest problem in Web3 isn't the technology itself. Natural language really can work, allowing Agents to handle those annoying things like chain selection and contracts. Users just need to express their needs, and that's it. If this continues, Web3 might truly become mainstream. But the key still depends on how the implementation turns out—don't let it become just a gimmick again.

View OriginalReply0