Recently, these events in the financial circle have made people see a harsh reality — how dark the利益链 behind certain research reports really is. Pre-emptive positioning, paid hype, retail investors taking the bait and then selling off — this process has become an industry chain.
In comparison, small articles tend to arouse suspicion, after all, they lack institutional backing. But with backing from正规军? That’s a different story. Most people will automatically lower their guard — after all, it’s a research report from a major brokerage, how could there be any issues?
That’s why I’ve always said, maintain a rational perspective on any research report. No matter how professional it’s written or how detailed the data is, don’t follow the trend lightly. To be honest, many analysts’ true水平 might even be worse than your own judgment.
So what should you do? My advice is:
**Logic First** — Regardless of the asset, ask yourself why you want to buy it. Does the fundamentals make sense?
**Trend Confirmation** — Technical and fundamental analysis should support each other; relying on only one is too risky.
**Timing with Volume and Price** — Be cautious during acceleration phases; the faster the rise, the more vigilant you should be.
**Moderate Positioning** — Don’t go all-in; build positions gradually and take profits gradually, reducing risk naturally.
If you find this operational logic too complicated, there’s an even simpler方案 — allocate some mainstream digital asset index funds or ETFs. Although the returns might not be as precise as selecting individual coins, it minimizes the risk of black swan events affecting stocks. For ordinary investors, this kind of stability is often more valuable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperer
· 12h ago
This system is essentially a harvesting mechanism, where big influencers and institutions together reap profits, while retail investors automatically send money.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12h ago
Really, once you see through this business model, you can never trust those pretty research reports again.
---
Those who go all-in with full positions probably never thought about why they are buying this thing.
---
Splitting positions sounds simple, but actually executing it well is the real skill.
---
Index funds are indeed a bit boring, but compared to the thrill of chasing high and getting caught, stability is truly appealing.
---
Big brokerage firms are just a cover-up.
---
The later you wake up, the harder you lose.
---
I remember the saying "logic first," next time I look at research reports, I’ll ask myself why I want to buy.
---
The most easily manipulated part is volume and price; chasing after rising prices is a deadly mindset.
---
In plain terms, don’t be fooled by the halo; having your own brain is more important than anything.
---
ETFs may not have a story, but at least they won’t tell you ghost stories in the middle of the night.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 12h ago
That research report is like a re-entrancy vulnerability in smart contracts—appearing legitimate on the surface but secretly hiding backdoors. Segregated accounts are the only audit-approved solution.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 12h ago
I've seen through it long ago; those big brokerages are just legally harvesting retail investors, only more professionally packaged.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 12h ago
More and more people are now aware of this trick, but some still insist on hitting the wall themselves.
No matter how bullish the research reports are, I just read them for fun; in the end, we're the ones who end up holding the bag.
The split-position strategy is really brilliant; going all-in at once is just pure gambler mentality.
That's why I now buy index funds directly—it's hassle-free, saves effort, and I can still see the next wave of the market.
Most analysts, to put it bluntly, are just tools serving institutions.
Recently, these events in the financial circle have made people see a harsh reality — how dark the利益链 behind certain research reports really is. Pre-emptive positioning, paid hype, retail investors taking the bait and then selling off — this process has become an industry chain.
In comparison, small articles tend to arouse suspicion, after all, they lack institutional backing. But with backing from正规军? That’s a different story. Most people will automatically lower their guard — after all, it’s a research report from a major brokerage, how could there be any issues?
That’s why I’ve always said, maintain a rational perspective on any research report. No matter how professional it’s written or how detailed the data is, don’t follow the trend lightly. To be honest, many analysts’ true水平 might even be worse than your own judgment.
So what should you do? My advice is:
**Logic First** — Regardless of the asset, ask yourself why you want to buy it. Does the fundamentals make sense?
**Trend Confirmation** — Technical and fundamental analysis should support each other; relying on only one is too risky.
**Timing with Volume and Price** — Be cautious during acceleration phases; the faster the rise, the more vigilant you should be.
**Moderate Positioning** — Don’t go all-in; build positions gradually and take profits gradually, reducing risk naturally.
If you find this operational logic too complicated, there’s an even simpler方案 — allocate some mainstream digital asset index funds or ETFs. Although the returns might not be as precise as selecting individual coins, it minimizes the risk of black swan events affecting stocks. For ordinary investors, this kind of stability is often more valuable.