2025-12-25 02:25:46

Have you ever thought about it, AI technology is now facing a dilemma.

On one hand, AI systems without privacy protection are essentially all-encompassing surveillance. Your data, behaviors, and preferences are all recorded and analyzed. On the other hand, AI without verifiable mechanisms makes it impossible for users to confirm whether the system is cheating or being manipulated.

This is why the direction of verifiability is so crucial. When AI decisions can be verified and audited, privacy can also be protected, truly achieving freedom. Not an empty freedom, but a protected freedom.

The ARPA project is building this bridge—enabling AI to both protect privacy and be verifiable. This approach may be the key to breaking this deadlock.

ARPA2.96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVictim

· 1m ago

Well said, privacy and verifiability really can't have both at the same time. Verifiability is the bottom line, otherwise how can we know if AI is secretly messing with us? The ARPA idea is still somewhat interesting; it depends on the actual results. It sounds quite ideal, but I'm afraid it might just be all talk and no action. If privacy is lost, everything is over; this area definitely needs to be taken seriously.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 7h ago

These two problems are indeed tough: monitoring and black boxes are both problematic. The combination of verifiability + privacy sounds good, but can it really be achieved? The ARPA approach depends on the implementation results; just talking about concepts is meaningless.

View OriginalReply0

PermabullPete

· 8h ago

To be honest, these dilemmas have long been in front of us, and everyone can see them. Privacy and transparency are inherently at odds. However, the aspect of verifiability is indeed interesting; I hadn't thought about it that way before. Is ARPA's approach to this reliable? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 8h ago

Well said, privacy and transparency should be both achievable; it's not a matter of choosing one over the other. Verification is indeed the key; otherwise, how can I tell if AI is truly smart or just guessing blindly? ARPA's approach is good, but can it really be implemented? These days, having ideals alone isn't enough. The term "dilemma" is used perfectly here; it feels like the entire industry is stuck at this point. Privacy monitoring and black-box decision-making—choosing either one is a dead end; we need to tackle both. True freedom is protected freedom; that's right, who wants that kind of nihilism? We need to wait and see how ARPA is executed; the plan on paper and reality are often worlds apart. This issue is more complex than it seems; it's not just about setting up a verification mechanism.

View OriginalReply0