2025-12-25 01:27:04

When AI agents are responsible for completing critical operations such as payments and financial management, reliability becomes the biggest concern. Kite's idea addresses the core issue—rather than having AI imitate human behavior, it's better to expose every step to the sunlight, making it traceable and rule-based.

What’s interesting about this approach is that it directly opens the door for AI to enter regulated financial and commercial sectors. Practical technical architecture design makes seemingly complex problems manageable.

What does the list of backers tell us? Strategic investments from giants like PayPal and Samsung are not just endorsements; they have already integrated Kite's technology into their actual business systems. This is not just proof of concept but real ecosystem expansion.

On the technical side, it’s also fascinating. Kite creates a unique verifiable identity for each AI agent, with permissions and budget rules directly written into the chain. Every operation can be tracked and audited—trust is no longer just a verbal promise but guaranteed by code.

Testnet data speaks volumes—handling hundreds of millions of interactions, the developer enthusiasm reflects genuine engagement. An active developer community is key to a project’s long-term success.

It’s worth noting that Kite’s modular architecture allows developers to assemble AI applications freely like building blocks. This flexibility accelerates innovation cycles and the architecture is fully designed for large-scale commercial scenarios.

Looking ahead to a future where AI becomes increasingly pervasive, the infrastructure that quietly ensures trusted execution environments at the foundational level will become even more valuable. Projects like Kite are likely to become an indispensable part of the machine economy era.

KITE-1.83%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

bridge_anxiety

· 17h ago

On-chain transparency is indeed the key to solving trust issues, much more reliable than black-box AI agents. PayPal and Samsung are already on board, which shows it's not just a pipe dream. Traceability + code guarantees—that's the right path, more useful than any verbal promises. Billions of interactions on the testnet demonstrate active developer engagement, which can't be faked. The modular architecture design is a good idea, lowering the barrier to development. Long-term, infrastructure-level components are truly valuable; the machine economy definitely needs this kind of stuff. I'm a bit worried that regulators might lag behind technological progress, but at least transparent on-chain operations reduce the risk. Permissions and budgets are directly written into the chain—this detail is well done, making audits transparent. The true measure of success is the enthusiasm of the developer community, which is a much more genuine feedback than whitepaper data. Real monetary investment and integration, not just PPT fundraising—there's a huge difference.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 17h ago

To be honest, I can't accept the logic of auditing every step of AI on the blockchain; it depends on how the real scenario plays out... PayPal and Samsung integrated directly? That’s definitely different, this means they are already in a profit-making state. On-chain permissions + auditing... it sounds like putting shackles on financial AI, but maybe those shackles are trust itself. I'm interested in modular block-building; developer activity is the only true standard for verification. The hundreds of millions of interactions on the testnet also sound acceptable. The underlying infrastructure is indeed easy to overlook, but projects that can truly survive into the machine economy era... it's hard to tell who is genuine and who is fake right now. However, this approach is definitely more reliable than "making AI completely autonomous," at least there are rules to follow, and trust is backed by code.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 17h ago

Oh, this Kite indeed addresses the pain points... The approach of traceability + on-chain rules is much more reliable than letting AI blindly imitate human operations. Are PayPal and Samsung already using it? That shows this is not just a fantasy; it's actually running in a production environment. On-chain verification of identity, permissions, and budgets hardcoded into the code... This is what trust should look like, no need to believe that AI has a conscience.

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 17h ago

On-chain traceability is truly impressive; it's much more trustworthy than black-box AI. --- PayPal and Samsung are both using it. This isn't hype; it's actually running in production environments. --- Understanding means making every step of AI transparent, with permissions written into smart contracts. This is what financial-grade systems should do. --- The developer community's activity level is the most genuine indicator; a project without vitality is just a pretty PPT. --- The modular architecture analogy of building blocks is excellent, directly lowering the development threshold. No wonder the ecosystem is expanding so quickly. --- Handling hundreds of millions of interactions has proven its stability; this is a true display of strength. --- At the end of the day, it's a trust issue. Code doesn't lie, and Kite has thoroughly understood this. --- Underlying infrastructure is always the most resilient to cycles; it all depends on who can persist until the day the machine economy truly explodes. --- The design of verifiable identities is interesting; each AI agent has an independent audit chain, which regulators should like. --- From concept validation to commercial ecosystem, this process has been quite solid, not just an empty project.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 17h ago

On-chain transparency is indeed the breakthrough point for financial AI, much more reliable than black box methods. PayPal and Samsung have both jumped on board, indicating this is not just hype. The modular block-building design approach is decent, reducing development barriers. Only those that can really run are worth paying attention to; testnet data doesn't lie. Trust written into the code—that's what Web3 should be doing. AI agents performing financial operations are useless with just promises; blockchain guarantees are needed. The underlying infrastructure is often overlooked, but it's usually the most valuable. Projects with high developer enthusiasm haven't really taken off, indicating the ecosystem is truly alive.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 17h ago

This architectural design really hit my RSI overbought zone, and the auditable on-chain permission system directly maximizes trust. PayPal and Samsung are both using it. This is not a testnet validation; this is a real fuel injection signal, and the launch window is already open. Hundreds of millions of interactions have gone through without any major issues, indicating that the stop-loss height setting of the code logic is very well thought out. In terms of underlying infrastructure, in the long run, it will definitely be the fastest track to escape velocity. Kite's positioning is still quite critical. Developer enthusiasm directly reflects the project's lifecycle trajectory, and this is the most solid indicator. Modular architecture is essentially a dimensionality reduction for developers, compressing the innovation cycle and providing a more optimal angle for large-scale application deployment.

View OriginalReply0