2025-12-25 00:36:44

ZK Intelligent Verifiable Computing Platform Brevis Officially Releases Details of Its Native Ecosystem Token BREV. According to official data, the total supply of BREV reaches 1 billion tokens, with a layered incentive distribution approach: 37% allocated to ecosystem development; 32.20% for community incentives to encourage ecosystem participants' contributions; 20% for the team; and 10.80% for investors.

Notably, the token allocations for the team and investors are fully locked in during the first year, with no initial unlocks, demonstrating a long-term commitment to the project. Afterward, the tokens enter a phased unlocking cycle, gradually releasing according to a 24-month schedule. This design protects early investors' interests, ensures the team's long-term focus, and reduces market sell-off risks through the locking mechanism. The flexible distribution for the ecosystem and community parts provides ample incentives for the development of the Brevis platform.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWizard

· 13h ago

The team locks it for a year and doesn't move. I've seen this tactic too many times. The key is how they release it over the next 24 months. Don't let it turn into a stair-step dump again.

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 13h ago

The team is locked for a year without unlocking, which is quite sincere and not like some projects that dump right after launch. --- Ecology accounts for 37%, community accounts for 32%, the distribution seems fairly balanced, but I wonder if it will turn into another feast of cutting leeks later. --- 24 months of phased unlocking? Extending the timeline is good, at least it won't be crushed by the team and VCs immediately after launch. --- Another ZK project, the competition in this track is fierce now. Why can Brevis stand out? --- The locking mechanism indeed reduces the risk of selling pressure, but it also makes liquidity a problem. Early investors have to bear this cost. --- Community incentives account for 32%, it seems reasonable, but it depends on how it is used. Whether it can truly encourage participation is another matter. --- A total supply of 1 billion doesn't seem scarce, it depends on the actual circulation pace later. --- Investors only account for 10.8%, which isn't a high ratio. Maybe it indicates that the funding rounds are already quite late?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHobo

· 13h ago

The tactic of ecological dominance is something I've seen too many times; the key is whether it can truly be implemented. I'm a bit surprised that the team is locking for a year; at least it's not a move to cut leeks. Only 32% of the community is involved; with this ratio, it seems participants won't get much benefit.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 13h ago

Team locking for a year is really tough; such determination is indeed rare. Once again, 37% ecological incentives—this tactic is the easiest to cut. Whether BREV can gain traction depends on actual application implementation. The allocation ratio is quite balanced, but is 1 billion tokens enough for dilution? The key is whether the unlocking pace later will cause a dump.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeAssassin