2025-12-25 00:23:40

Those who have followed the $SMRT project should have noticed that the recently issued new tokens are very likely an upgraded version of the original project. On-chain information verification shows that the new token's contract association and the project team's information indeed point to the same team. Such project iterations are quite common in the Web3 ecosystem—when the project team restarts or upgrades, they issue new tokens while maintaining the original ecosystem foundation. For holders, understanding this type of project evolution is very helpful and can assist you in better judging the project's long-term development direction.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHermit

· 12h ago

It's the same old trick again, launching new coins as if it's an upgrade. Anyway, I'm just waiting to see how it unfolds next.

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 12h ago

Wait, so this time it's really an upgrade and not a scam? If the on-chain data checks out, I might be convinced.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketNoodler

· 12h ago

On-chain data is right there, it’s indeed the same group of people. This iteration is still considered normal operation. --- It's the same old upgrade rhetoric; it depends on whether the new coin can be pulled out. --- It's obvious already, contract addresses don't lie. The key is whether it can survive the next bear market. --- Just keep the original ecosystem intact, no need for fancy tricks. --- Holders with a bit of brains should check on-chain information; those too lazy to do their homework should cut their losses. --- Projects like these that restart really test the team's execution ability. Just talking nicely doesn't help. --- Let's wait and see the liquidity of the new coin; that's the real test of whether it's a genuine upgrade.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 12h ago

I checked on the blockchain, and it's definitely the same group of people coming back to harvest another wave of retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 12h ago

It's the same trick again. New coin launches claim to be an upgrade. I'm already tired of it.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 12h ago

It's the same old trick, new coins again. --- Is the on-chain information all consistent? Then I need to take another look at their wallet addresses. --- The upgraded version sounds good, but I'm just worried it's another rebrand. --- If this team really wants to do a good job, why bother issuing new coins? Can't they just upgrade directly? --- So here's the question: what about the old coins? Do I have to exchange them myself? --- A typical Web3 scam, taking a cut and then taking another. --- Holders don't understand anything, big players have already cashed out. --- I'm really curious why the same team operates two coins. Is it really necessary? --- I just want to know if this iteration will go up or keep falling.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleMaid

· 12h ago

Uh, this is another wave of crypto tricks. Watching the same old tricks with new coins gets old. Upgrade, upgrade. What exactly is being upgraded? They all seem the same to me. On-chain information can tell us something, but ultimately it depends on whether the team is reliable. I am really cautious with projects like this, afraid of getting caught in a scam. But indeed, you need to do thorough research before jumping in. Don't follow the crowd blindly.

View OriginalReply0