Curious about the project's token release strategy—why did the team decide to launch the coin before activating the buyback mechanism? The contract address 8DkXJ4EtmfEuVccjH53gyxnPj3Lk8ZfUhAkf1MK2BAGS shows the asset is already live, yet the core stabilization mechanism isn't operational yet. This timing choice raises questions about the tokenomics design and how it affects early holders. Seems like an unconventional approach to token economics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketMonk
· 3h ago
Issuing tokens first and then initiating buyback? That operation is indeed a bit outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 3h ago
Issuing tokens first and then repurchasing? I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 3h ago
Issuing tokens first and then initiating buybacks? I've seen this trick way too many times.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 3h ago
Issuing tokens first and then launching a buyback mechanism? That operation is indeed outrageous. What were the early bagholders thinking?
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 4h ago
Issuing tokens first and then implementing a buyback mechanism? I've seen this trick before; early investors are always the cannon fodder.
Curious about the project's token release strategy—why did the team decide to launch the coin before activating the buyback mechanism? The contract address 8DkXJ4EtmfEuVccjH53gyxnPj3Lk8ZfUhAkf1MK2BAGS shows the asset is already live, yet the core stabilization mechanism isn't operational yet. This timing choice raises questions about the tokenomics design and how it affects early holders. Seems like an unconventional approach to token economics.