This result was indeed a bit surprising. Xiao Xia ultimately ranked second as a trader, but the final winner of this human vs. machine battle was still AI.
Thinking about it carefully, the logic behind this is actually quite interesting—AI can always maintain a relatively stable leverage strategy and won't emotionally adjust due to market fluctuations; whereas human traders tend to slip up at this stage. When the market rises, they want to add positions; when it falls, they want to cut losses. Leverage and positions constantly change driven by emotions, making it easy to fall into traps.
Anyway, this was indeed a very valuable competition. Being able to face AI directly and still rank in the top two shows that traditional traders' experience and intuition are still valuable in certain scenarios. Congratulations to Xiao Xia for this performance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektButStillHere
· 2025-12-27 06:19
Hey, if AI wins, it wins, but little Xia can still hold his own against it and rank second. Now that's a tough guy.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 2025-12-25 11:04
Honestly, the fact that AI wins this kind of thing should have been anticipated a long time ago. It has no emotions and won't be scared by candlestick charts into making chaotic trades.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptain
· 2025-12-24 07:42
Haha, AI stable? I just laugh. Wait until AI also goes through a round of cutbacks before trying to boast to me.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 2025-12-24 07:36
Oops, AI wins again... It feels like we human traders are really getting more and more competitive.
When emotions run high, leverage and positions are as volatile as a roller coaster... AI's cold and steady strategy, while we watch the K-line rise three points and want to go all in, drop a bit and want to run away. The gap... damn, it's really incomparable.
It's already good enough that Little Knight ranks second; at least there's some respect for humans, right? But honestly, if I were to participate, I’d probably get crushed by AI pressing me to the floor, haha.
This time, I was really surprised. I thought human intuition could turn the tide... Looks like I still need to honestly learn from the machine.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 2025-12-24 07:34
The result of the man-machine battle is like this; we still have to admit that AI is indeed reliable. However, this ranking of Xiaoxia shows that experience is still valuable.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 2025-12-24 07:31
It's normal that AI wins; machines have no fear, while we traders are animals driven by emotions.
This result was indeed a bit surprising. Xiao Xia ultimately ranked second as a trader, but the final winner of this human vs. machine battle was still AI.
Thinking about it carefully, the logic behind this is actually quite interesting—AI can always maintain a relatively stable leverage strategy and won't emotionally adjust due to market fluctuations; whereas human traders tend to slip up at this stage. When the market rises, they want to add positions; when it falls, they want to cut losses. Leverage and positions constantly change driven by emotions, making it easy to fall into traps.
Anyway, this was indeed a very valuable competition. Being able to face AI directly and still rank in the top two shows that traditional traders' experience and intuition are still valuable in certain scenarios. Congratulations to Xiao Xia for this performance.