2025-12-24 01:28:05

A team faced a $10k shortfall and made the call to launch their project ahead of schedule to raise capital quickly. Sometimes market timing and necessity drive execution—regardless of what prompted the decision, the execution phase kicked off. Interesting case study on how urgency shapes project timelines in crypto.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeNightmare

· 2025-12-26 16:20

Daring to go all-in with a 10k gap? That's pretty standard in crypto, anyway—it's all about burning money while raising funds.

View OriginalReply0

StableNomad

· 2025-12-26 14:29

tbh this screams 2017 all over again... watched too many teams do the "panic launch to save the treasury" play. statistically speaking, projects born from desperation hit different—and not in the good way. risk-adjusted returns on a rushed tokenomics? yeah, ngl, correlation coefficient between urgency and rug pull is... let's just say it's uncomfortable.

Reply0

APY_Chaser

· 2025-12-24 01:57

Damn, a shortfall of 100,000 yuan requires going live early? This is too common in the crypto world, to put it bluntly, it's being forced into a corner with no way out.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat