Imagine a scenario: the Hyperliquid ecosystem continues to show strong growth, but other HL-native Tokens are performing mediocrely. This paradox is worth pondering.
Hyperliquid is quite generous to ecosystem participants—the deployers and frontend operators can benefit from the value of the protocol. But the question is, if other native tokens on HyperCore do not succeed, where do the profits earned actually go?
This is not just a numbers game. How long will this unequal situation last when value in the ecosystem continues to concentrate on the main Token, while other projects struggle to find their own value propositions? Can the healthy development of the entire ecosystem truly rely on a single Token? These questions may need to be key considerations when we evaluate long-term prospects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Imagine a scenario: the Hyperliquid ecosystem continues to show strong growth, but other HL-native Tokens are performing mediocrely. This paradox is worth pondering.
Hyperliquid is quite generous to ecosystem participants—the deployers and frontend operators can benefit from the value of the protocol. But the question is, if other native tokens on HyperCore do not succeed, where do the profits earned actually go?
This is not just a numbers game. How long will this unequal situation last when value in the ecosystem continues to concentrate on the main Token, while other projects struggle to find their own value propositions? Can the healthy development of the entire ecosystem truly rely on a single Token? These questions may need to be key considerations when we evaluate long-term prospects.