2025-12-23 02:42:19

The experience with a Wallet is quite heart-wrenching. In December 2024, this Large Investor was optimistic about ENA and invested 16.85 million coins at an average price of $1.099, totaling an investment of $18.52 million. A whole year has passed, and this decision has turned into a textbook case of "miss out" — Holdings shrank by 82%.

The most ironic thing is that just 7 hours ago, this guy finally admitted it and put all his holdings into a certain compliant platform, with a recharge price of only $0.2079. In other words, if he really sold at this price, the paper loss would be $15.02 million. The drop from $1.099 to $0.2079 raises questions about whether this decline is due to a complete misjudgment of the market or issues with the ENA project itself.

This case also reminds us that in the crypto market, no matter how large the capital amount, it cannot change the fundamental rule of "buy low and sell high." In just one year, an investment of 18.52 million USD has more than halved, which is why risk management is always the top priority.

ENA2.03%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevHunter

· 11h ago

Wow, this expenditure of 18.52 million USD directly evaporated 15 million... This is why I never go all-in on a coin. Is the ENA project really disappointing or just bad luck? Anyway, I'm not daring to bet on this anymore.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 12-23 03:12

18.52 million USD shrank by 82% in a year, this is what you call real "tuition fees" haha --- Look at this Large Investor's operation... it really is a textbook example of a bad case --- ENA fell from 1.099 to 0.2079, you must be really optimistic to hold it for a whole year, I'm impressed --- Investing in the platform means admitting defeat, a loss of 15.02 million, no matter how you calculate it, it hurts --- No amount of money can save you from bad timing, crypto is just that realistic --- Holdings shrank by 82% and still dare to invest in the platform... this is truly desperate --- Risk Management comes first +1, looking at this guy makes it clear what a bloody lesson means --- In a year, 18.52 million has been halved, this ENA drama is really worth watching --- Exchanging 16.85 million pieces for 0.2079... how much psychological shadow must that be --- Can't blame the project, just a misjudgment, nothing more to say

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 12-23 03:11

$18.52 million was cut in half and then some, that's why I never go all in on a single project. This wave of ENA did indeed pump and dump, entering at 1.099 and exiting at 0.2079, it really shows how unclear things can get. Even Large Investors can't escape; the key still lies in the lack of stop loss awareness... Again, no amount of money can withstand the wrong timing. The lesson from this brother, I see so many people are going to pay tuition.

View OriginalReply0

VCsSuckMyLiquidity

· 12-23 03:02

$18.52 million just disappeared like that, it's truly a textbook case of what not to do. --- This guy too, pouring in so much money and still missing out, I just don't understand why he didn't stagger his investments. --- ENA fell from 1.099 to 0.2, what does that indicate? Either the project is disappointing or he got played for a sucker. --- That's why I never go all in on a coin; risk management is no joke. --- An 82% shrinkage... still dare to take it out to the exchange, how hard is it to admit defeat? --- Large Investors can't even save themselves; over $15 million in tuition fees, is it worth it? --- I just want to ask, how could you hold a position for a whole year and not realize you needed to stop loss? --- The sorrow of a typical value investor, seeing the right direction but not waiting for that day. --- The lessons from this trade are worth more than anything else, although the cost is a bit high.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 12-23 02:53

18.52 million dollars evaporated over 15 million in a year, this is the price of faith deposit. --- Large Investors getting on board does not equal having foresight, this wave of ENA is a living counterexample. --- Recognizing losses and depositing on the platform? This guy finally sees clearly, a whole year too late. --- From $1.099 to $0.2079, this fall... the project party really should reflect on it. --- To put it bluntly, it was still a wrong bet on the direction, no amount of money can save a misjudgment. --- Holding 16.85 million coins for a whole year just for this? It’s infuriating to think about. --- Risk Management being the top priority is not wrong, but who really thought about it when getting on board? --- If this were the retail investors, they would have been Get Liquidated long ago, Large Investors can’t withstand an 82% shrinkage either. --- Deciding to sell just seven hours after depositing on the exchange, how difficult must that psychological adjustment be? --- Is there a problem with the ENA project itself or is it the dumb buyer's misjudgment at a high position? It seems the latter is more significant. --- Another "I am optimistic" story that ultimately turned into "I am pessimistic."

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-37b9b3f6