[Chain Article] Interesting viewpoints shared: A well-known investor mentioned several real issues facing Bitcoin in a recent podcast discussion. He believes that key problems such as insufficient transaction transparency and the risk of being hacked are present, which will affect whether central banks and large institutions are willing to hold Bitcoin on a large scale.
In simple terms, what institutional investors care about the most are these - security, liquidity, and regulatory clarity. For Bitcoin to truly enter the traditional financial system, it has to overcome these hurdles. Of course, different investors will have different opinions, and this topic has always been controversial in the community. What do you think?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 16h ago
Transparency and security are indeed common topics, but will institutions really give up Bitcoin for this reason? It feels a bit like an over-exaggeration of the risks.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffee
· 16h ago
Transparency and security have always been a recurring theme; the real issue lies in the regulatory attitude.
Bitcoin entering TradFi? Let's first deal with those people at the Fed.
Risk of hacking? Laughable, where was the concern when the traditional financial system was hacked?
Wait, is the risk of hacking really that big? Or is this guy just trying to scare people?
To be honest, institutions just want cheap chips and then come up with a reason to push prices down.
I've heard enough of this rhetoric; institutions will eventually come in, everything takes a backseat in the face of profit.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmpty
· 16h ago
Transparency? Dude, isn't this the core of Bitcoin? The blockchain is inherently transparent, so why are we still talking about shortcomings?
The biggest fear for institutions getting on board is policy risk; safety is actually secondary...
If one really wants to hold large amounts, it would be better to sort out regulations first; everyone is waiting for the government to make a decision.
This is just the same old talk again; we discuss this every year. When will we truly break the deadlock?
To be honest, liquidity isn't really the issue; it's much easier to get on board now. The key issue is still confidence.
The Central Bank doesn't want to use it at all; talking about safety seems like an excuse. The real reason is something everyone knows deep down.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 16h ago
Transparency? Security? Man, I've heard this speech too many times, institutions just want cheaper chips.
---
Sounds nice, but they're just afraid of being trapped, waiting for it to fall to their psychological price before shouting to adopt it.
---
I've heard too many of these arguments over the years, and what happened? Institutions are still hoarding.
---
Cracking risks? I haven't seen any institution truly hacked, just scaring people here.
---
Clarity is just a facade; if they really want to make money, nothing is a problem. They're just talking because they haven't figured it out yet.
---
Will institutions come when regulation is clear? I doubt it, this business isn't that simple.
---
Wait a minute, the liquidity issue does exist, he is right about that, the OTC market needs to catch up.
---
Here it comes again, it's always the same routine, and then institutions secretly increase the position.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.eth
· 16h ago
The risk of transparency is indeed a common topic, but if the Central Bank is serious about it, we still need to see how the regulation plays out.
Investors Discuss the Prospects of Bitcoin Institutional Adoption: Transparency and Security Remain Key Barriers
[Chain Article] Interesting viewpoints shared: A well-known investor mentioned several real issues facing Bitcoin in a recent podcast discussion. He believes that key problems such as insufficient transaction transparency and the risk of being hacked are present, which will affect whether central banks and large institutions are willing to hold Bitcoin on a large scale.
In simple terms, what institutional investors care about the most are these - security, liquidity, and regulatory clarity. For Bitcoin to truly enter the traditional financial system, it has to overcome these hurdles. Of course, different investors will have different opinions, and this topic has always been controversial in the community. What do you think?