Recently, I saw a project with a pretty good fundraising move—raising 18.75 million USD. This time, the new token issuance is based on a valuation of 20 million, which makes sense from a valuation perspective.
The specific parameters for the token sale are as follows: the cutoff score is set at 225 points, each address can purchase up to 3 BNB, and each participation consumes 15 points. The quota has almost been snapped up, and trading started at 6 o'clock.
Honestly, this valuation and fundraising scale are not unreasonable. I didn't plan to authorize early to reserve a spot. As always—wait and watch, buy when the price is right, and observe otherwise. Projects like this generally have a solid fundraising background, but the performance after the new token launches still depends on market response and liquidity depth.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MechanicalMartel
· 2025-12-20 07:24
The 225-point threshold is really tough, and you have to fight for the quota... Maybe wait until it goes live and drops the price before jumping in.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 2025-12-18 23:47
225 points card is a bit aggressive. Let's wait until the market opens at 6 o'clock to see if it crashes the market.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 2025-12-18 16:10
Is the quota all snapped up? Haha, the speed is really impressive. I was still considering whether to participate or not.
---
A valuation of 20 million is okay, but after launch, many projects have dropped. I'm in the wait-and-see camp.
---
A score of 225 points is quite high, need to carefully consider if it's worth it.
---
Solid fundraising background ≠ ability to hold up after launch. Still, the same advice—decide based on liquidity.
---
The limit of three BNB feels a bit tight; seems like there's not much room for risk hedging.
---
It's the same old trick—quota disappears in seconds, then the price, classic routine.
---
Watching the market first before taking action is a good approach. Don't get caught up in FOMO.
---
A funding of 18.75 million isn't small, but the gap between valuation and actual performance is usually significant.
---
I just want to know which institutions are behind this project, whether there are reliable VC backers.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 2025-12-17 20:50
$1,875 million in funding with a $20 million valuation, this logic is okay, not as outrageous as some projects.
Are all the quotas already snapped up? That's normal, feels a bit concerning about liquidity.
Let's wait and see, if it's suitable, jump on board; if not, forget it.
New coins are ultimately a gamble on liquidity; whether this project can succeed depends on the market.
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 2025-12-17 11:56
The financing amount and valuation are so close, it's really a bit strange.
---
The 225-point threshold is a bit high, requiring both positioning and points. This combo punch is indeed fierce.
---
Wait, are all the quotas already taken? It's only a few o'clock. These people are really restless.
---
Basically, it's about betting on liquidity. The financing party looks good, but whether they can make a splash after going live depends on other factors.
---
I agree with the non-authorized positioning choice. Anyway, these kinds of projects are the same; whether you rush to buy on the first day or buy the dip, some will profit and some will lose.
---
Probably someone will be unable to sleep the night before the 6 o'clock opening. I think I'll pass.
---
The difference between 1875 and 2000 is just a small gap. Their skill in fabricating numbers is really strong.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 2025-12-17 11:54
The limit has been snatched up again. Same old trick, it seems quite a few people still fall for it.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 2025-12-17 11:38
18.75 million financing for a 20 million valuation, this logic indeed makes sense, just see if it can hold up in the future.
---
Seeing seconds to deplete credit limits is common, the key still depends on how the market moves after the 6 o'clock launch.
---
I support not rushing ahead, anyway there are many projects like this, no need to bet on this one.
---
A score of 225 points is quite high, you need to stock up on points in advance.
---
Solid financing background, but liquidity in the secondary market is the real indicator.
---
I think it's better to wait and see, anyway the difference between morning and evening rides isn't too big.
---
The 3 BNB cap is a bit conservative, how do big players play?
---
Once the financing news of this type of project is released, it gets pumped, but the real trump card still depends on the post-launch trend.
---
15 points at a time is a bit expensive, but compared to missing a 100x opportunity, it's nothing.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 2025-12-17 11:29
All the quotas have been snapped up, and I am still hesitating whether to hit it or not. This move is a bit disappointing.
Recently, I saw a project with a pretty good fundraising move—raising 18.75 million USD. This time, the new token issuance is based on a valuation of 20 million, which makes sense from a valuation perspective.
The specific parameters for the token sale are as follows: the cutoff score is set at 225 points, each address can purchase up to 3 BNB, and each participation consumes 15 points. The quota has almost been snapped up, and trading started at 6 o'clock.
Honestly, this valuation and fundraising scale are not unreasonable. I didn't plan to authorize early to reserve a spot. As always—wait and watch, buy when the price is right, and observe otherwise. Projects like this generally have a solid fundraising background, but the performance after the new token launches still depends on market response and liquidity depth.