The market has already priced in the rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Where are we now? Watching to see if Bitcoin can establish a foothold at the 80,000 level. If it can withstand these obvious negative factors, it shows that the bulls really have confidence; but if it breaks, capital risk appetite may collectively retreat, and in the short term, it will be a period of correction.



Both technical and sentiment indicators are at a crossroads. Retail investors have already been shaken out, and the remaining game depends on how big capital chooses—whether to buy the dip or stay on the sidelines.

Here's an interesting question: if institutions really move in, will they directly pour money into highly volatile spot trading, or will they look for more stable ways to participate? Recently, many people have asked me what I think about those "institution-grade" DeFi projects. Some believe this is real innovation, while others think it's just high-end manipulation. I took a close look, and the matter is indeed not as simple as it appears.

Earning interest on BTC sounds straightforward, but the mechanisms can be complex. Protocols like Lorenzo do more than just let Bitcoin earn interest. What they are really doing is unlocking BTC liquidity, enabling it to safely grow across multiple chains, in a fully verifiable manner, while users retain absolute control over their assets. This is entirely different from directly buying stock in a company that holds BTC.

Buying shares of a leading tech company is a bet on its stock price movement, which is fundamentally traditional investment logic; participating via DeFi protocols means making Bitcoin itself an interest-earning asset within the blockchain ecosystem—offering returns without giving up control of the assets. For institutions, this approach is attractive not only because of the yield but also because of its manageable risk profile.
BTC-0.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobiavip
· 12-17 05:45
Whether breaking 80,000 is a true test or not is like a magic mirror; retail investors have long been harvested as leeks.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistakervip
· 12-16 22:38
Is breaking 80,000 really the watershed? It all depends on how the big whales act now.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatchervip
· 12-16 00:50
Whether the 80,000 is broken or not is the key; if broken, you'll have to wait for the recovery period. This round, retail investors have indeed been slaughtered a bit miserably.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 12-16 00:49
Whether breaking 80,000 is really the key, once broken, we will have to consolidate for a while To put it simply, institutions now just want stable returns. Lorenzo, in my view, is indeed different
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobiavip
· 12-16 00:49
Whether the critical level of 80,000 is broken or not truly determines the upcoming momentum. Right now, big funds are testing retail investors' psychological defenses.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 12-16 00:46
If 80,000 can't be broken, it just shows confidence; once it's broken, it truly has to retreat.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretendervip
· 12-16 00:35
Whether 80,000 is broken or not is really crucial. If it breaks, the short-term trend might require re-aligning the team.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)