On-chain data in the early morning has drawn market attention—a $12.2 million ETH long position with 25x leverage is nearing liquidation. This case once again exposes the true risks behind high-leverage trading.
Dangerous Critical Point
The opening price of this position was $3,190, and the liquidation line has been lowered to $3,056. Amid frequent market fluctuations, each 1% price change is enough to push this massive position to the brink of liquidation. Unrealized losses have exceeded $270,000, and the holder urgently added nearly $200,000 in margin on the night before forced liquidation—this move has sparked market speculation about their true intentions.
Is it a fearless bottom sniper? Or a forced self-rescue? Regardless, what this number tells is the consequence of breaking traditional risk management principles.
The Cost of High Leverage
Discussions within the community also reveal different mindsets among market participants. Some straightforwardly say: "Millions of dollars just consumed like that, no different from reckless spending." This view reflects caution towards the risks of high-multiplier leverage.
But others hold their breath, closely watching the market—this position has become a market sentiment indicator. If ETH hits a key technical level, a chain of liquidations could trigger a new wave of selling pressure, causing panic in the market.
From the data, continuously adding margin without reassessing the strategy is essentially a forced defense of existing decisions. This "trend-facing stubborn resistance" approach often results in greater costs.
Market Lessons
This case at least reminds investors of three realities:
First, leverage is a double-edged sword. While it amplifies gains, it also infinitely magnifies risks. Traders with hundreds of millions in assets are not immune to market rules.
Second, opposing the trend requires enough patience, capital, and luck—lacking any one of these can be fatal. Once judgment deviates, increasing positions only accelerates losses.
Third, the movements of large position holders are worth observing, but blindly copying them is usually a grave mistake for retail traders.
Currently, the long-short battle for ETH has entered a critical stage. Some believe this is the last test by large funds before bottom-sniping, expecting a rally afterward. Others wait patiently for liquidation confirmation, viewing it as a sign of extreme market sentiment. More rational participants adhere to a simple principle: stay away from excessive leverage, and steady accumulation is the key to long-term gains.
In any case, this $12.2 million position has become yet another textbook example—reminding everyone with real numbers that exchange leverage tools are like a double-edged sword—used well, they can bring competitive advantage; used poorly, they only hurt oneself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 12-14 16:51
Playing ETH with 25x leverage and still holding on? This guy is really tired of living. With a floating loss of 270,000, he dares to add another 200,000 in margin. With this IQ, he still wants to make money.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 12-14 16:50
Playing with 25x leverage and going so big, really not afraid of death...
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 12-14 16:49
25x leverage players are really something else; risking 200,000 with a 270,000 unrealized loss shows a gambler's mentality.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 12-14 16:48
Playing with 25x leverage so aggressively, aren't you afraid that a 1% fluctuation will wipe you out?
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 12-14 16:47
Another victim of leverage backlash, 12.2 million just gone... Where's the promised bottom sniper?
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperer
· 12-14 16:38
technically speaking, adding 200k margin before liquidation is just... fascinating edge case of "hope is not a strategy". that's not bottom fishing, that's panic in disguise
On-chain data in the early morning has drawn market attention—a $12.2 million ETH long position with 25x leverage is nearing liquidation. This case once again exposes the true risks behind high-leverage trading.
Dangerous Critical Point
The opening price of this position was $3,190, and the liquidation line has been lowered to $3,056. Amid frequent market fluctuations, each 1% price change is enough to push this massive position to the brink of liquidation. Unrealized losses have exceeded $270,000, and the holder urgently added nearly $200,000 in margin on the night before forced liquidation—this move has sparked market speculation about their true intentions.
Is it a fearless bottom sniper? Or a forced self-rescue? Regardless, what this number tells is the consequence of breaking traditional risk management principles.
The Cost of High Leverage
Discussions within the community also reveal different mindsets among market participants. Some straightforwardly say: "Millions of dollars just consumed like that, no different from reckless spending." This view reflects caution towards the risks of high-multiplier leverage.
But others hold their breath, closely watching the market—this position has become a market sentiment indicator. If ETH hits a key technical level, a chain of liquidations could trigger a new wave of selling pressure, causing panic in the market.
From the data, continuously adding margin without reassessing the strategy is essentially a forced defense of existing decisions. This "trend-facing stubborn resistance" approach often results in greater costs.
Market Lessons
This case at least reminds investors of three realities:
First, leverage is a double-edged sword. While it amplifies gains, it also infinitely magnifies risks. Traders with hundreds of millions in assets are not immune to market rules.
Second, opposing the trend requires enough patience, capital, and luck—lacking any one of these can be fatal. Once judgment deviates, increasing positions only accelerates losses.
Third, the movements of large position holders are worth observing, but blindly copying them is usually a grave mistake for retail traders.
Currently, the long-short battle for ETH has entered a critical stage. Some believe this is the last test by large funds before bottom-sniping, expecting a rally afterward. Others wait patiently for liquidation confirmation, viewing it as a sign of extreme market sentiment. More rational participants adhere to a simple principle: stay away from excessive leverage, and steady accumulation is the key to long-term gains.
In any case, this $12.2 million position has become yet another textbook example—reminding everyone with real numbers that exchange leverage tools are like a double-edged sword—used well, they can bring competitive advantage; used poorly, they only hurt oneself.