Bitcoin has just been moving around in the past month with little change. The current market is a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. Today it's lively here, tomorrow it's comfortable elsewhere, and in the end, middlemen profit from the spread—the exchanges and market makers collecting fees and benefiting from slippage.
In plain terms, what does this reflect? New money isn't flowing in. It's all about existing capital competing with each other; no one can take a bite out of the other's meat, and eventually, everyone gets worn down slowly. It's like two people fighting with strength; neither can overpower the other, and the spectators have long lost interest and walked away.
At this stage, it’s all about perseverance. Either wait for new narratives to explode onto the scene, or continue with this annoying sideways fluctuation.
Speaking of new narratives, the concept of bridging traditional finance sounds grand, but in reality, this idea is everywhere—almost every project is shouting this slogan. How many can really be implemented?
The stBTC direction is worth a look. Bitcoin is indeed still underutilized in the DeFi ecosystem; the space is there. But there are also quite a few competitors in the same track, and the competition has become somewhat intense.
On the technical side, both MACD and RSI point to an uptrend, so it looks pretty good in the short term. But what I really want to know is the project's TVL and actual usage frequency. Infrastructure stuff ultimately depends on how much capital can be accumulated and whether users will continue to stay. Those are the real indicators.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 2025-12-16 09:22
Middlemen are really just sitting back and winning, while we're still fighting each other.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 2025-12-15 21:29
Taking a month off, rubbing against each other on both sides, and in the end, both get robbed by the exchange. It's like two fragments of ancient artifacts clashing; neither can piece together a complete object.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 2025-12-14 05:37
The middlemen are really benefiting a lot, while the coins we hold here are still shrinking.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 2025-12-13 12:50
Another month of dull fluctuations, middlemen making a killing
Exchanges and market makers are having a blast, retail investors are worn down to doubt their lives
Where is the real growth? Who knows
Wait, how's the TVL data on stBTC? Is anyone monitoring it?
It seems this round depends on perseverance to survive, the new story hasn't knocked on the door yet
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 2025-12-13 12:50
Middlemen really make a huge profit; we're being exploited here.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 2025-12-13 12:49
Middlemen profit from the price difference, retail investors are fighting each other—this is the current deadlock.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 2025-12-13 12:49
Market makers are indeed draining liquidity in volatile markets, but from the perspective of computing power revenue ratio, this is actually a good time to deploy.
Truly implementable projects are indeed scarce; TVL is the true litmus test.
Only those who persevere at this stage can make money; those seeking quick gains have been worn out.
The competition within the stBTC track is a fact, but it still depends on who has stronger capital accumulation ability.
Instead of chasing new narratives, it's better to look at which projects have increasing active addresses.
It's a game of existing assets; the key variable is when new money will enter the market.
Everyone has dispersed, and in the end, those who can endure loneliness are the ones who profit.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatcher
· 2025-12-13 12:45
Exchanges and market makers are laughing their heads off, while we're just arguing here.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 2025-12-13 12:44
Another month of "hosting" market, exchanges are laughing last
Each new narrative is more exaggerated than the last, but which one is actually implemented? Hehe
stBTC is indeed interesting, but with such intense competition, I can't pretend I haven't seen it
TVL is the real key, technical aspects are all nonsense
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 2025-12-13 12:27
The middleman earns the difference is really amazing, retail investors cut each other there, and the exchange laughs the happiest.
Bitcoin has just been moving around in the past month with little change. The current market is a tug-of-war between bulls and bears. Today it's lively here, tomorrow it's comfortable elsewhere, and in the end, middlemen profit from the spread—the exchanges and market makers collecting fees and benefiting from slippage.
In plain terms, what does this reflect? New money isn't flowing in. It's all about existing capital competing with each other; no one can take a bite out of the other's meat, and eventually, everyone gets worn down slowly. It's like two people fighting with strength; neither can overpower the other, and the spectators have long lost interest and walked away.
At this stage, it’s all about perseverance. Either wait for new narratives to explode onto the scene, or continue with this annoying sideways fluctuation.
Speaking of new narratives, the concept of bridging traditional finance sounds grand, but in reality, this idea is everywhere—almost every project is shouting this slogan. How many can really be implemented?
The stBTC direction is worth a look. Bitcoin is indeed still underutilized in the DeFi ecosystem; the space is there. But there are also quite a few competitors in the same track, and the competition has become somewhat intense.
On the technical side, both MACD and RSI point to an uptrend, so it looks pretty good in the short term. But what I really want to know is the project's TVL and actual usage frequency. Infrastructure stuff ultimately depends on how much capital can be accumulated and whether users will continue to stay. Those are the real indicators.