2025-12-13 07:01:10

#美联储降息 A quantitative trading expert from a leading asset management firm recently put forward a bold opinion — $BTC is just a "digital toy" and fundamentally lacks the financial attributes expected of a long-term institutional investment target. This kind of voice from traditional financial giants hits close to home for many retail investors. Is it that BTC's fundamentals are not solid enough, or is there a bias in institutional understanding of digital assets? This controversial topic is especially interesting at a time when Federal Reserve policies are facing adjustments. Market participants have differing opinions — some support this view, while others believe that the evaluation standards used by institutions are simply not applicable to emerging asset classes.

BTC2,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoffeeOnChain

· 2025-12-16 02:05

This guy clearly doesn't understand Bitcoin, still using the stock market standards in the crypto space.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 2025-12-15 22:42

Uh, the institutional talk has become more elaborate, huh? This time they’re using the term "digital toys"? I’ve seen through it all along—when the price of coins rises, they still jump in; when it falls, they start blaming it on lacking financial attributes, haha. The traditional financial valuation models are simply not suitable; why insist on using bond thinking to evaluate Bitcoin? Isn’t this logic like putting new shoes on old feet? Wait, is the Federal Reserve really going to cut interest rates? Then where will the hot money flow to?

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 2025-12-13 07:30

Sounds good, but it's just because institutions haven't bought the bottom yet. Now they're shifting the blame onto retail investors😒.

View OriginalReply0

On-ChainDiver

· 2025-12-13 07:30

Haha, these old-school traditional finance guys are still using that broken standard to evaluate Bitcoin. It’s truly laughable. --- Institutions say BTC is a toy, so how do you explain their holdings over the past two years? They say one thing with their mouth but are very honest with their actions. --- Digital toy? I’d like to see how much annualized return this "toy" can outperform them. --- This is a typical mindset that can't differentiate between new wine in old bottles. If you don’t understand, just deny it. --- When interest rates are cut, instead of celebrating, they start criticizing coins. Looks like they’re panicking. --- Instead of arguing whether it has attributes or not, it’s better to see who is making money. Data is the most honest. --- They say it’s not enough to have financial attributes; frankly, it’s just regret for missing out on the dividends.

View OriginalReply0

unrekt.eth

· 2025-12-13 07:27

Speaking of which, this guy is really out of touch, still looking at BTC with a ten-year-old perspective.

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 2025-12-13 07:26

These traditional finance folks just can't stand us making money. Now you're commenting? Why didn't you comment back then?

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 2025-12-13 07:21

Uh... institutions say BTC is a toy? Laughing to death, their valuation models can't even connect to on-chain assets. --- The interest rate cut cycle has arrived, yet they're still bearish. These traditional finance guys still haven't grasped Bitcoin's narrative. --- I've said it before, institutional awareness lags repeatedly. It's happening again now; it seems my prediction is still clear-headed. --- Basically, they haven't gained much yet, so they just belittle BTC. When institutions truly start allocating, their attitude will change. --- The rise and fall of mainland China. Last year it's bearish, now they still have to buy the dip. After playing for so long, don't they understand that on-chain data speaks? --- What are you talking about financial attributes? BTC's scarcity consensus isn't worse than gold; it's just their aesthetic sense that lags. --- It's the same old rhetoric... I've heard it too many times. When market sentiment hits bottom, doubts always surface. --- Ha, this is why retail investors are ultimately educated. They belittle while secretly building positions. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0