The public opinion environment around stablecoins is indeed interesting. As soon as someone speaks, they are praised repeatedly; slightly voicing a different opinion and they are seen as someone disrupting the atmosphere. It feels like the space for discussion is becoming a bit tight.
The story of USDD is worth pondering. Do you remember when it dropped to 0.97? The situation back then was not very good. Now they are talking about "stability breeds trust," which is quite bold. Honestly, projects that were once hyped up often fall into a downturn—this has been seen too many times. Trying to take market share from USDT? That’s no easy feat.
The chart trend looks pretty good this time, with some levels definitely worth paying attention to. Just don’t forget, once stablecoins have issues, the chain reaction can collapse the entire ecosystem. The risk is always there, and no matter how beautiful the data looks, it can’t change that.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreets
· 2025-12-15 22:13
That 0.97 hit is still vivid in my mind. Now you want to snatch some gains from USDT? Dream on.
No matter how loud you boast, data can't save you. The ecosystem is inherently fragile.
The discourse space is indeed more restricted, but to be honest, when it's time to cut losses, you still have to do it. Don't be deluded by illusions.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 2025-12-15 16:43
Here we go with the same narrative again. That USDD at 0.97 really can't hold anymore. Now everyone is talking about risk management—who would believe it?
---
If the stablecoin collapses, everything collapses. How many times do I have to say this? Just looking at the beautiful K-line doesn’t mean anything.
---
Getting criticized for having different opinions—that’s a very familiar playbook. Just like those projects back in the day.
---
USDT is still doing well. Who’s so eager for USDD to grab market share? Overthinking it.
---
The chain reaction part is indeed concerning, but it seems no one wants to listen.
---
So it looks like another round of hype, followed by another decline—cycle repeats.
---
The chart looks good, but the risks are still there. How come some people just can't see it?
View OriginalReply0
TokenSherpa
· 2025-12-15 15:01
actually, let me break this down – if you examine the governance precedent here, historically speaking, stablecoins that face depegging events rarely recover their narrative credibility, empirical evidence suggests. the voting power dynamics around USDD's recovery narrative are... let's say fundamentally flawed from a tokenomics framework perspective.
Reply0
GasOptimizer
· 2025-12-14 18:28
Really, as soon as you dare to say USDD is not good, you'll be attacked collectively. The public opinion environment definitely feels off.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 2025-12-12 22:50
That 0.97 part was really awkward. Now there's more gossip, but the tricks are all the same.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrownies
· 2025-12-12 22:47
0.97 that wave I remember, now talking about trust again, it's really a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 2025-12-12 22:44
Listen, I saw clearly that USDD hit 0.97, and now you're starting to spin stories? That's a bit funny.
To put it plainly, the projects that are hyped up always end in failure. Is this wave coming again? The USDT market isn't that easy to grab.
The chart looks good, but once stablecoins collapse, the entire ecosystem is doomed. No matter how beautiful the candlestick charts are, they can't save it. The risk is always there.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweeper
· 2025-12-12 22:30
0.97 That wave really made me laugh, now they're talking about trust again. I've seen this routine way too many times.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 2025-12-12 22:29
nah the 0.97 depegging was giving us all the alpha signals no one wanted to hear... oracle manipulation playbook 101 tbh
Reply0
DaoResearcher
· 2025-12-12 22:27
Based on on-chain data and voting trends in governance proposals, this phenomenon of public opinion suppression actually reflects the incentive incompatibility issue among token holders. The drop from 0.97 in USDD precisely validates my previous thesis note about the imbalance of the Collateral Ratio — the fragility of algorithmic stablecoins under market stress has been conclusively proven. Now they promote "stability as trust," which is basically narrative engineering and fundamentally unsupported from the perspective of token economics. Trying to抢USDT份额? Unless there is a fundamental reset of the incentive mechanism, this is a dead end.
The public opinion environment around stablecoins is indeed interesting. As soon as someone speaks, they are praised repeatedly; slightly voicing a different opinion and they are seen as someone disrupting the atmosphere. It feels like the space for discussion is becoming a bit tight.
The story of USDD is worth pondering. Do you remember when it dropped to 0.97? The situation back then was not very good. Now they are talking about "stability breeds trust," which is quite bold. Honestly, projects that were once hyped up often fall into a downturn—this has been seen too many times. Trying to take market share from USDT? That’s no easy feat.
The chart trend looks pretty good this time, with some levels definitely worth paying attention to. Just don’t forget, once stablecoins have issues, the chain reaction can collapse the entire ecosystem. The risk is always there, and no matter how beautiful the data looks, it can’t change that.