Recently, I took the time to sort out the layout of the global low-orbit satellite Internet and found that the smell of gunpowder in this space race was stronger than imagined.



Let's talk about the two major domestic players first.

On the side of the "State Grid Constellation" (GW), backed by the resources of the national team, the target is directly aimed at the scale of 12,992 satellites. After the first batch of networking satellites were launched in December last year, the pace has accelerated significantly - 1,300 units will be laid before 2030 (almost 10% of the progress), and there will be no dead ends in global signals by 2035. This style of play is steady and steady, typical of "building the skeleton first and then filling the meat".

On the other hand, the ambitions of the Thousand Sail Constellation (G60 project) are even wilder. The long-term plan is to directly pull more than 15,000 satellites, and by the end of this year, 648 satellites will be rotated first to cover key areas, the number will be doubled to 1,296 by the end of 2027, and global coverage will be achieved by then, and finally more than 15,000 ultimate networking will be completed by the end of 2030. In addition to broadband communications and the Internet of Things, they also want to get mobile phones directly connected to satellites - if this lands, the experience may be explosive.

Look at the other side of the ocean again.

SpaceX's Starlink is now the industry benchmark, and there is nothing to compete for. Musk has planned a super network of about 42,000 satellites, and as of June this year, more than 10,000 have been launched (including scrapped). Starlink's core competitiveness is not just about scale, the key is that their launch costs are low enough, and they have already begun to make money - streaming media, games and other high-bandwidth scenarios are using their services.

Interestingly, on Amazon's side. Although the Kuiper plan only planned to deploy 3,236 satellites, Bezos obviously couldn't wait - in order to catch up, they directly signed a contract with their old rival SpaceX to help them send satellites with Falcon 9. This wave of operations is somewhat like "the enemy of the enemy is a friend", business competition is competition, and cooperation must be cooperated.

On the whole, this low-orbit satellite war is essentially grabbing tickets to the space Internet in the next decade. Whoever completes the network first, who has a lower cost, and who has a better service experience can basically lock in the right to speak on this track.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 11h ago
Musk's method is really amazing, and the cost can still make money, so let's follow the trend and learn
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 11h ago
Starlink has already started to make money, are we still counting?
View OriginalReply0
TokenStormvip
· 12h ago
Well... From a technical point of view, this data density is a bit terrifying, 12992 vs 15000+ vs 42000, this growth curve can see at a glance who is all in and who is holding steadily. To put it bluntly, we are still fighting for launch costs and networking speed, who completes the key critical point of 1% first, followed by the compound interest harvest period. But I still bet that Starlink will continue to crush... It does not constitute any advice ha [dog head] --- Qianfan's routine of connecting the mobile phone directly to the satellite is interesting, if it really lands, this eye of the storm may be crazier than imagined. But the question is - who will pay for the cost? Client or enterprise? The on-chain data has not yet seen the logic of this business model --- Bezos asked Musk to send a satellite... I have to say, it's a bit amazing. The risk factor has plummeted from competitors, but it also means that Kuiper's voice has been severely diluted. This is called "the enemy is also Party A" --- The national team is steady and steady vs. private enterprises running, this rhythm difference is too interesting. But it's really hard to backtest who has a better cost coefficient, and we'll talk about it when the data in 2027 comes out
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)