To be honest, the former president's attitude toward WLFI is no longer just a hint—it's an open and clear move.
Previously, I put forward the view: WLFI will definitely hit $20, may spike to $70, and will most likely fluctuate around $47 as a stable price range—this price point is convenient for large funds to cash out.
What happened? A bunch of people jumped out to refute: “If WLFI hits $20, its market cap will surpass some top platform tokens, and at $47, wouldn’t it be bigger than ETH? Are you dreaming?”
Are there still people refusing to admit it now?
I’ve said it before: this guy was president for four years, there’s no way he’s leaving office in disgrace. What’s more, this is his last term, so of course he’ll maximize his interests—grab as much as he can.
Once he’s made the money, the next step is to find a channel to legitimize it, and by the way, slap an “old money” label on his family.
But some people just don’t believe it: “There’s regulation in the US, how could a president openly profit?”
And now? He’s not even bothering to put on an act.
The official stablecoin USD1, which is benchmarked against $38 trillion in US Treasuries, is now just a part of the WLF ecosystem. Ironic, isn’t it?
How many people still remember WLFI’s underlying logic?
USD1 is pegged to $38 trillion in US Treasuries, and WLFI is launched as its derivative, branded as the “president’s coin.” To make this label stick, WLFI whitelisted that guy: no matter how high the price goes or how low the circulation gets, he always holds 22.3% of the total WLFI supply.
Now the script has flipped—USD1 has become the derivative of WLF.
In 2026, WLFI will also push for RWA (Real World Assets) on-chain. Given his style, what do you think he’ll peg it to?
My guess: the first asset will still be US Treasuries, similar to ONDO’s logic, focusing on stable growth.
The second? Either the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, or maybe Silicon Valley tech parks or NASA. If he goes extreme, it could even be pegged to US real estate.
No matter what the peg is, it’ll definitely be a giant asset that can push WLFI’s market cap to the sky.
Some people are still analyzing WLFI with traditional crypto logic? I don’t even know if that’s naive or just childish.
Nvidia, Tesla—which of them doesn’t have a trillion-dollar market cap? Behind WLFI stands the US president. Would it be outrageous for its market cap to surpass theirs? Is it unreasonable?
Let me just ask: does this former president have more power than Jensen Huang or Elon Musk?
Since the answer is obviously yes, then as long as he’s still in that position, any price WLFI reaches is plausible.
That’s the true value of power.
Getting in early on WLFI—that’s the real king’s way.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTDreamer
· 11h ago
Wow, I have to admit, I respect this logic—power really is valuable.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreaker
· 12-11 03:30
Damn, this logic is too bold, directly taking power as a chip?
Are you serious... can power really buy the bottom of the coin price?
This explanation sounds really clever, but I always feel something's not quite right
Market cap surpassing Nvidia and Tesla, how crazy is that?
I wish I had bought some to try my luck earlier
The value of power is indeed valuable, but the craziness of the crypto world is even more valuable
So is there still a chance to enter now?
This plot twist is really brilliant, USD1 has turned into a derivative
It reminds me a bit of a project from last year, which was also backed by the elites and ended up crashing
But this time is different, the support from U.S. debt is something else
But I still have to ask: can this last until 2026?
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 12-10 05:52
Well... This logic is a bit amazing, power is indeed the hardest asset
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 12-09 20:45
Damn, this logic is outrageous. Can power really make the price go up?
You’re really bold to say that, there’s no way I’m buying it.
47U is still a dream, it might even go to zero.
This RWA logic sounds interesting, but the problem is, who’s going to be the bag holder?
I’ve honestly never heard of that 22.3% whitelist you mentioned, are you sure you didn’t make it up?
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 12-09 20:44
Damn, this logic is really insane. The part about power being valuable is spot on.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 12-09 20:44
Damn, this logic is really bold—directly exchanging power for token price. This move is truly one of a kind.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 12-09 20:44
No, this guy is being pretty harsh... But I have to say, the power coin logic really is something else—it can crash the market even harder than any technical analysis.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 12-09 20:42
Damn, I really can't handle this logic anymore, haha.
To be honest, the former president's attitude toward WLFI is no longer just a hint—it's an open and clear move.
Previously, I put forward the view: WLFI will definitely hit $20, may spike to $70, and will most likely fluctuate around $47 as a stable price range—this price point is convenient for large funds to cash out.
What happened? A bunch of people jumped out to refute: “If WLFI hits $20, its market cap will surpass some top platform tokens, and at $47, wouldn’t it be bigger than ETH? Are you dreaming?”
Are there still people refusing to admit it now?
I’ve said it before: this guy was president for four years, there’s no way he’s leaving office in disgrace. What’s more, this is his last term, so of course he’ll maximize his interests—grab as much as he can.
Once he’s made the money, the next step is to find a channel to legitimize it, and by the way, slap an “old money” label on his family.
But some people just don’t believe it: “There’s regulation in the US, how could a president openly profit?”
And now? He’s not even bothering to put on an act.
The official stablecoin USD1, which is benchmarked against $38 trillion in US Treasuries, is now just a part of the WLF ecosystem. Ironic, isn’t it?
How many people still remember WLFI’s underlying logic?
USD1 is pegged to $38 trillion in US Treasuries, and WLFI is launched as its derivative, branded as the “president’s coin.” To make this label stick, WLFI whitelisted that guy: no matter how high the price goes or how low the circulation gets, he always holds 22.3% of the total WLFI supply.
Now the script has flipped—USD1 has become the derivative of WLF.
In 2026, WLFI will also push for RWA (Real World Assets) on-chain. Given his style, what do you think he’ll peg it to?
My guess: the first asset will still be US Treasuries, similar to ONDO’s logic, focusing on stable growth.
The second? Either the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, or maybe Silicon Valley tech parks or NASA. If he goes extreme, it could even be pegged to US real estate.
No matter what the peg is, it’ll definitely be a giant asset that can push WLFI’s market cap to the sky.
Some people are still analyzing WLFI with traditional crypto logic? I don’t even know if that’s naive or just childish.
Nvidia, Tesla—which of them doesn’t have a trillion-dollar market cap? Behind WLFI stands the US president. Would it be outrageous for its market cap to surpass theirs? Is it unreasonable?
Let me just ask: does this former president have more power than Jensen Huang or Elon Musk?
Since the answer is obviously yes, then as long as he’s still in that position, any price WLFI reaches is plausible.
That’s the true value of power.
Getting in early on WLFI—that’s the real king’s way.