Last week I did something that was both hilarious and frustrating—I paid $0.01 in API fees for a new AI model using an old-school bank credit card. When the bill came, I was dumbfounded: besides that one cent, there was a $0.30 processing fee. Even more ridiculous, it takes two or three days for the payment to clear.
Think about it: when AI is running, it might need to handle thousands or even tens of thousands of these micro-transactions per second. If every call worked like this, the fees alone would drain it dry, not to mention the snail-paced settlement. This whole mess made me realize: traditional payment systems are a joke in the age of AI.
Why are those payment giants dropping the ball on AI payments? You have to look at their roots.
Credit card networks and bank transfers were built for “large transactions” and “multi-party endorsements” from the start. Every payment has to go through multiple checkpoints: identity verification, risk control, multi-party settlement… For big purchases like houses and cars, this system works. But what does AI need? Ultra-high-frequency micropayments and millisecond-level real-time settlement. When traditional systems face these demands, they just can’t cope.
That’s where Web3-native solutions like KITE come in. They don’t involve the cumbersome middleman processes—instead, they settle directly peer-to-peer on the blockchain. Fees? Almost negligible. Settlement time? Done in seconds. For AI agents, this is the kind of payment infrastructure that actually works—payments won’t drag down performance, and profits won’t get eaten up by fees.
Put simply, traditional payments are products of the industrial era, while AI requires digital-native solutions. In this transformation, the lumbering giants are still stuck in place, while agile new players are already moving ahead.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MevWhisperer
· 4h ago
$0.3 fee for $0.01? Now that's a real blood bath.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 12-09 17:13
A $0.01 transaction gets charged a $0.3 fee? These banks are ruthless, haha.
Traditional payments really can't keep up with the pace of AI; for microtransactions, we need a new approach.
Tens of thousands of calls per second—just the fees alone would bankrupt you. No wonder people are looking for Web3 solutions.
Banks are still sleepwalking, they've never even considered these scenarios.
It takes two or three days for funds to arrive? AI can't wait that long—realistic settlement needs to be instant.
Platforms like KITE have really nailed it: peer-to-peer direct settlement is just simpler.
There are too many middlemen; honestly, it's time for them to be eliminated.
Thinking about it, that $0.3 fee is just absurd—the enemy of micropayments.
The rules of traditional finance are a joke in the face of AI—there's just no way around it.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 12-09 17:10
A $0.01 fee out of a $0.3 transfer? That’s just ridiculous.
If the bank hasn’t gone bankrupt by now, I’ll admit I was wrong.
Web3’s instant settlement isn’t hype—traditional payment systems really need to retire.
That’s why we need to embrace on-chain payments. These old-school systems really should be scrapped.
My god, the fee eats up the principal—banks really know how to run a business.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 12-09 17:08
$0.01 was actually deducted as $0.31. This bank is just ridiculously outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 12-09 17:05
Cutting a $0.3 fee down to $0.01? That’s real robbery, damn, those bankers are something else.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 12-09 17:04
A $0.01 transaction gets charged a $0.3 fee, what the heck is this haha
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 12-09 17:01
A $0.01 fee is charged, this bank is really unbelievable haha
Last week I did something that was both hilarious and frustrating—I paid $0.01 in API fees for a new AI model using an old-school bank credit card. When the bill came, I was dumbfounded: besides that one cent, there was a $0.30 processing fee. Even more ridiculous, it takes two or three days for the payment to clear.
Think about it: when AI is running, it might need to handle thousands or even tens of thousands of these micro-transactions per second. If every call worked like this, the fees alone would drain it dry, not to mention the snail-paced settlement. This whole mess made me realize: traditional payment systems are a joke in the age of AI.
Why are those payment giants dropping the ball on AI payments? You have to look at their roots.
Credit card networks and bank transfers were built for “large transactions” and “multi-party endorsements” from the start. Every payment has to go through multiple checkpoints: identity verification, risk control, multi-party settlement… For big purchases like houses and cars, this system works. But what does AI need? Ultra-high-frequency micropayments and millisecond-level real-time settlement. When traditional systems face these demands, they just can’t cope.
That’s where Web3-native solutions like KITE come in. They don’t involve the cumbersome middleman processes—instead, they settle directly peer-to-peer on the blockchain. Fees? Almost negligible. Settlement time? Done in seconds. For AI agents, this is the kind of payment infrastructure that actually works—payments won’t drag down performance, and profits won’t get eaten up by fees.
Put simply, traditional payments are products of the industrial era, while AI requires digital-native solutions. In this transformation, the lumbering giants are still stuck in place, while agile new players are already moving ahead.