2025-12-09 05:12:31

Since the official approval and launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs, the entire crypto market’s rules of the game have quietly changed.

The once-revered “four-year halving cycle” theory now needs to be re-examined. The large-scale entry of traditional institutional funds has significantly altered the market’s liquidity structure, capital flows, and even the logic behind price fluctuations.

The periodic booms and busts once dominated by retail investors are now being gradually smoothed out by the sustained allocation needs of institutions. What does this mean? It may mean that we need to use an entirely new framework to understand Bitcoin’s price trends, instead of continuing to apply the old “halving–bull market–crash” playbook.

BTC2.55%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractHunter

· 20h ago

To be honest, the halving cycle narrative should have been broken a long time ago. Institutional entry has changed more than just the amount of capital—the entire market mindset has shifted. Retail investors can no longer keep up with the old chase-the-pump-and-dump rhythm. --- Those still waiting for a halving-driven surge are likely to be disappointed. Institutional allocation needs have smoothed out volatility. What does this mean? It means the era of wild growth is truly over. --- The market has indeed become much smoother since ETFs were approved, but what I really want to know is whether this smoothness is due to institutional rationality or if it's just the calm before the bull run. --- The old playbook no longer applies, but has a new framework emerged? It feels like everyone is still exploring, institutions included. --- Institutional participation sounds professional, but reduced volatility also means it's harder to make money—the golden era for retail investors is truly over.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBouncer

· 21h ago

Is the halving cycle theory outdated? Ha, those old-timers must be so disappointed… Once institutions come in, they just smooth out the volatility, and retail investors lose the thrill. --- So anyone still trading based on the four-year cycle is just a sucker now? Guess it’s time to come up with new strategies. --- Institutional allocation demand smooths out prices? That sounds like the crypto space is being tamed… Honestly, it’s kind of boring. --- Wait, so will those big crashes that used to push prices down still happen? Feels like the profit margin is getting squeezed out. --- The spot ETF came in and directly changed the “pulse” of retail investors. That’s the real power shift, right there. --- The old script doesn’t work anymore… No wonder the market has been so “polite” lately, it doesn’t have that crazy vibe from before. --- As soon as institutional money enters the market, volatility drops—this is a disaster for short-term traders. --- The framework needs to be rebuilt, but honestly, most people are still playing by the old rules. No wonder they’re losing money. --- If the liquidity structure has changed, just say it directly—no need to beat around the bush. --- Is the halving still important? I think it might still matter, just not as much as before.

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 21h ago

Alright, the halving cycle theory has collapsed. Now it's all about how the institutions are going to play this. Someone should've said this earlier; the retail investor playbook is outdated. Institutions entering the market to smooth out volatility? Doesn't seem like it, prices are still dropping lately. So what's the new framework? Has anyone summarized it? Thinking about it, retail investors are actually more likely to get rekt now. Sticking to the old script must have led to big losses. Those who can hold on are making bank, time to switch to the new playbook.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-5854de8b

· 21h ago

Oh, the halving cycle theory should have been tossed out a long time ago. Once institutions entered the game, they directly changed the rules. The logic between institutions and retail investors is completely different. The old tricks really don't apply much anymore. Now Bitcoin's price movement is more stable, and I'm actually a bit not used to it... There's less of that thrilling, heart-pounding feeling. Wait, does this mean there are fewer volatility opportunities? How am I supposed to make quick gains now, haha? Institutional capital has indeed changed the entire ecosystem. The old cycle theory needs to be completely overhauled.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 21h ago

Honestly, the halving cycle theory should have been updated a long time ago—ever since institutions entered the market, everything has changed. So, how are we retail investors supposed to play now? These days, buying Bitcoin feels more and more like buying stocks... kind of boring, honestly. Institutional allocation smoothing out prices? Sounds impressive, but does it actually suppress price increases? If the four-year cycle is broken, then those who went all in and waited for the halving are going to be devastated. New framework, new framework—easy to say, but who can actually tell me what the framework looks like? This logic sounds nice, but we still need to see how the price moves next. Change the rules? Looks to me like institutions are just here to harvest one last wave from retail investors. Now that institutions are starting to accumulate coins too, what does that mean... By this logic, does it mean things will get even more stable and less exciting going forward?

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 21h ago

Uh, so that's it for the halving cycle? Institutions show up and the rules have to be rewritten? That's a bit ridiculous, man. --- Honestly, smoothing out volatility sounds nice, but I still want to see when institutions are going to bail. --- Wait, so the logic here is that there won't be any more huge ups and downs in the future? Then what am I supposed to trade? --- The spot ETF comes and suddenly everything changes, that's pretty wild. But is the halving cycle really dead? That feels a bit too absolute. --- Institutional allocation needs to be smooth? Please, capital is always capital—they'll still fleece the retail investors when they can. --- So should I just hold my coins and wait for death now, or keep trading the swings? I'm kind of confused. --- New framework, new framework, easy to say, but people will still lose big. Human nature doesn't change, so the cycle won't either. --- Institutions entering the market = a more stable market? I'm not buying that logic just yet.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinCreatorCertificationProgramToEarn$10,000
108.01K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
28.42K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
9.68K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
6.75K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
36.8K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
DOGS狗币人生
MC:$3.63KHolders:1
0.00%
2
DOGBTCDOGBTC
MC:$3.64KHolders:0
0.00%
3
googlegoogle
MC:$3.63KHolders:1
0.00%
4
ArAier
MC:$3.63KHolders:1
0.00%
5
yml于朦胧
MC:$3.63KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap