I have seen too many people who want to turn over overnight with a small principal, but the account is cleared in less than a month. But there is a friend who is different, he used 1,500U to roll to 45,000U, not by luck, but by the principle of a few dead ends to the end.

Let's talk about the position first. His money is never all in one direction - 500U specializes in short-term, closes when it sees good, and clears its position when it rises by about 3%, never fantasizing about how much space there is behind; In addition, 500U is used to ambush band opportunities, but the standards are very harsh, and the expected return of less than 15% is not considered at all; Finally, 500U is an immovable emergency fund, no matter how tempting the market is, it will not be touched. This split looks conservative, but in fact it leaves room for adjustment at any time, so as not to lose the principal in a wave of pullback.

Let's talk about how he chooses the timing. The market is grinding sideways most of the time, and frequent entry and exit is to work for handling fees. His approach is simple and crude: if you don't understand it, you can take a short position, and wait for the trend signal to be clear before making a move. I remember that a mainstream coin broke through the key resistance level and continued to rise, he ate a 25% increase in that wave of the market, and directly took away part of it after getting the profit, not greedy for the possible higher point later. Many novices always want to catch every band, but every time it is a small loss, it is better to focus on one or two big opportunities.

The most ruthless thing is his enforcement discipline. If a single loss hits the 2% line, stop the loss directly without saying a word, and never take chances and rebound; If the profit exceeds 5%, half of the bag will be dropped first, and the remaining position will move the stop loss line to the cost price, at least to ensure that there will be no loss; Orders that have already lost money will never cover the position to amortize the cost, because there are too many examples of falling deeper and deeper. No one can judge the right direction every time, but as long as you control the drawdown every time, the account will naturally rise in the long run.

If you want to make a big deal with small funds, you don't need any talent, the key is to have a set of play that can be repeatedly verified, and then strictly implement it. The path from 1,500U to 45,000U, to put it bluntly, is to control risks and seize opportunities, and everything else is floating clouds.