So Goldman just scooped up an ETF fund manager. What's the real play here? According to Aaron Brown, this isn't some altruistic move to revolutionize investing for the little guy. Nope.



It's the same old game—keeping those sweet, sweet fees channeling straight into Wall Street's pockets. Think about it: traditional finance giants aren't jumping into ETF management because they suddenly care about democratizing access. They're doing it because the fee structure, even if slimmer than old-school mutual funds, still prints money when you've got scale.

Brown's take cuts through the PR fluff. While retail investors celebrate "lower cost" products, institutions are quietly building empires on volume. Billions in assets under management? Even a 0.2% fee adds up fast. And who benefits most? Not the investors watching their portfolios inch forward. It's the firms collecting management fees like clockwork, quarter after quarter.

The ETF boom promised disruption. Instead, we're watching consolidation—old money adapting, not dying. Goldman's acquisition isn't innovation. It's adaptation. The fees might look different, but the destination stays the same: their balance sheet, not yours.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 12-08 10:46
Here we go again, financial tycoons disguising themselves as champions of democratization while actually fleecing retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPullvip
· 12-08 10:44
At it again? Goldman thinks buying an ETF fund manager will clean up their image? Let’s be real, it’s the same old trick—just a new disguise to keep fleecing people. A 0.2% fee sounds small, but multiply that by tens of billions in assets under management... hmm, that’s tens of millions going into their pockets every year. What are retail investors so happy about, really?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 12-08 10:43
Same old tricks, just a different packaging. To put it plainly, Goldman’s move is all about a 0.2% scale effect—when the volume gets big, they make easy money. Retail investors cheer for the “low fees,” not realizing that management fees on tens of billions in assets are already ticking time bombs. No matter how they dress up the fee structure, the money still ends up in those same few Wall Street accounts.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDivervip
· 12-08 10:37
Here they go harvesting retail investors again, just with a different disguise this time... 0.2% fee sounds small, but that's exactly how these institutions make their money.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 12-08 10:33
It's the same old trick—just a new disguise to keep fleecing newcomers.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflictvip
· 12-08 10:20
At it again? Goldman Sachs acquires an ETF fund manager, claiming to democratize investing on the surface, but in reality, it’s just covering up the fee-printing machine. 0.2% may seem small, but multiply that by billions in assets and they’re raking it in every year, while retail investors like us just watch our accounts grow slowly as they count their money. All this talk about disrupting finance, but in the end, it’s just old money putting on a new disguise to keep harvesting.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)