Ran execution tests across four perp DEXs using $100k orders—Lighter consistently dominated the leaderboard. Second place? Pretty competitive, with occasional wins on certain altcoin pairs.



Pulled execution cost data (measured in basis points) from LiquidView and another monitoring tool. The results? One platform maintains razor-thin spreads regardless of the asset, while others show more variability depending on liquidity depth. When milliseconds and basis points matter, consistency beats occasional outperformance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoTherapyvip
· 10h ago
Lighter really dominated the opponent this time. The consistency is truly outstanding.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21eevip
· 12-08 07:53
Damn, is Lighter really this stable? Seriously? I have to test it myself.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMastervip
· 12-08 07:46
Is Lighter really that powerful? Have you actually used it? I feel like good-looking data doesn't necessarily mean it's reliable in real trading.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 12-08 07:42
Lighter really nailed it this time, even 100k orders are running so smoothly... Why are the other platforms still patching things up?
View OriginalReply0
SelfRuggervip
· 12-08 07:39
Lighter is truly unbeatable; all the others are just along for the ride.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)