Ran execution tests across four perp DEXs using $100k orders—Lighter consistently dominated the leaderboard. Second place? Pretty competitive, with occasional wins on certain altcoin pairs.
Pulled execution cost data (measured in basis points) from LiquidView and another monitoring tool. The results? One platform maintains razor-thin spreads regardless of the asset, while others show more variability depending on liquidity depth. When milliseconds and basis points matter, consistency beats occasional outperformance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoTherapy
· 10h ago
Lighter really dominated the opponent this time. The consistency is truly outstanding.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 12-08 07:53
Damn, is Lighter really this stable? Seriously? I have to test it myself.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 12-08 07:46
Is Lighter really that powerful? Have you actually used it? I feel like good-looking data doesn't necessarily mean it's reliable in real trading.
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTrader
· 12-08 07:42
Lighter really nailed it this time, even 100k orders are running so smoothly... Why are the other platforms still patching things up?
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 12-08 07:39
Lighter is truly unbeatable; all the others are just along for the ride.
Ran execution tests across four perp DEXs using $100k orders—Lighter consistently dominated the leaderboard. Second place? Pretty competitive, with occasional wins on certain altcoin pairs.
Pulled execution cost data (measured in basis points) from LiquidView and another monitoring tool. The results? One platform maintains razor-thin spreads regardless of the asset, while others show more variability depending on liquidity depth. When milliseconds and basis points matter, consistency beats occasional outperformance.