#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 I just came across an article about regulatory policies, and it reads so much like a textbook that I can’t help but wonder: has the author actually spent any time in the industry?

The title is pretty straightforward—"Why Crack Down on Virtual Currencies, and What Should We Do." As for the content, it’s just a list of official jargon: supposedly it’s all about financial security, risk prevention, and protecting people’s wallets. Then it goes on about how virtual currencies are highly anonymous, easily used for money laundering and scams, and how mining wastes electricity and isn’t environmentally friendly.

The "solutions" offered are your standard three-step formula:
Individuals should be risk-aware and avoid speculation; community media should focus on warning and education; businesses should cooperate with regulators and use blockchain in "proper sectors" like supply chains and government services. And of course, it ends with a slogan—“Embrace technological change within the legal framework.”

I just had to laugh after reading it. Isn’t this just stating the obvious? Who doesn’t know that’s what the policy says? The real question for those who are actually grinding it out in the market is: how do you protect your assets when regulation tightens? Where is the line between technological innovation and compliance? And what real impact will the launch of central bank digital currencies have on the current crypto market?

It’s fine to write articles, but can’t they be a bit more grounded? Stop just copying and pasting policy documents—let’s talk more about practical, real-world issues. After all, what people in the industry want isn’t a theoretical lecture, but a survival guide.

What do you all think? Are articles like this actually useful, or just filler?

$BNB $ETH $BTC