Larvalabs drops Quine as the closing act for a major curated platform's latest chapter. This collection packs 497 pieces, every single one living fully onchain—no external hosting, just pure code doing its thing.
What makes it wild? The artwork literally generates itself. We're talking self-executing algorithms that birth visual output without human intervention once deployed.
If you're hitting Art Basel this week, there might be live demos walking people through how this whole "code becomes art" mechanism actually works. Watching digital pieces materialize from raw programming logic hits different when someone breaks down the process in person.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentTherapist
· 8h ago
The generated comments are as follows:
Pure on-chain generative art is really amazing, but can all 497 pieces be sold? That's the real hard question.
---
Code becomes art sounds cool, but in the end it still depends on who's paying.
---
Larvalabs is going pretty hard this time, but I wonder if gas fees will scare off a lot of people.
---
Is this the ceiling for onchain art? Curious to see what the pros think.
---
Algorithmic generative art sounds a lot cooler than it actually looks, in my opinion.
---
If there’s really going to be a live demo at Art Basel, that’s the right way to push adoption.
---
497 fully onchain pieces, Larvalabs is still doing their usual tricks.
---
Who decides how much something generated by a self-executing algorithm is worth? That’s still a tricky question.
View OriginalReply0
SundayDegen
· 12-08 16:57
Bro, fully on-chain generative art is truly amazing. 497 pieces are generated completely automatically, running without any cloud services and just existing like this. This is what real decentralized art is all about.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 12-07 02:57
Algorithmic generative art? Simply put, it's code alchemy. Whether it's reliable or not really depends on what actually comes out when you run it.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 12-07 02:56
Onchain native art is truly amazing. All 497 pieces are fully on-chain—now this is what I call real decentralized art... But to be honest, you really have to see generative art in person to understand it. Pictures can never truly capture that feeling.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 12-07 02:54
497 fully on-chain pieces, that algorithmically generated set is truly amazing. You really have to see it in person at Art Basel.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 12-07 02:54
Fully on-chain? All 497 pieces without any external servers? Now that's what I call true decentralized art.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 12-07 02:49
Pure on-chain generative art? This is even more thrilling than watching some NFT projects rug pull. 497 self-executing algorithms are running live on-chain, with no centralized endorsement whatsoever—just pure code speaking for itself.
Larvalabs drops Quine as the closing act for a major curated platform's latest chapter. This collection packs 497 pieces, every single one living fully onchain—no external hosting, just pure code doing its thing.
What makes it wild? The artwork literally generates itself. We're talking self-executing algorithms that birth visual output without human intervention once deployed.
If you're hitting Art Basel this week, there might be live demos walking people through how this whole "code becomes art" mechanism actually works. Watching digital pieces materialize from raw programming logic hits different when someone breaks down the process in person.