Some traffic channels simply can’t support the conversion demand of this market cycle.
Earlier, I personally tested this by hiring Jingxiang, who is somewhat well-known in the industry, and her friend to run ads. The result? The conversion rate was nearly zero. Even someone from a top exchange privately admitted that “pretty girl” or borderline content traffic looks lively on the surface, but the actual conversions are disastrously low.
Even small-scale operators like me can’t be bothered with these channels anymore—the data speaks for itself, and the input-output ratio simply doesn’t add up. To put it bluntly: projects that are still throwing their budgets in this direction are basically paying a “stupidity tax.” The market has already proven the answer with real money; stop hoping for miracles.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirDropMissed
· 7h ago
Oh man, not this again. I've fallen for this before—pretty girl traffic is just a front.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 12-06 15:04
The ultimate way for attractive influencers to exploit their followers—have you seen it clearly?
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdropper
· 12-06 15:04
Damn, I noticed this a long time ago—those pretty girls selling products are just running a scam to fleece people.
Seriously though, are there still people who actually believe this stuff converts?
You can tell just by looking at the ROI; it doesn’t hold up at all.
This market cycle really tests real skills. All the flashy stuff should have been eliminated long ago.
I’ve been trading for so long; conversion rate is what really matters. Everything else is just fluff.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 12-06 14:56
This type of channel should have been eliminated long ago; it's a waste of money.
Seriously, the data is right here.
I've also seen a bunch of projects squander their budgets like this—it's hilarious.
And there are still people who believe in influencer marketing with pretty faces—so naive.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 12-06 14:55
Honestly, the whole pretty-girl traffic thing should have died out long ago. It's all nonsense when faced with real data.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 12-06 14:47
Already saw through it long ago. The "pretty girl traffic" thing is just an IQ tax harvesting machine, and the data is terrible.
---
Seriously, there are still projects pouring money into this? They deserve to get harvested.
---
A conversion rate stuck at zero isn’t even a joke. Anyone who still believes in this really lacks market sense.
---
I've tested it myself—it’s nothing but self-deception.
---
This round of the market is all about real data. Inflated traffic should have been kicked out ages ago.
---
Honestly, it’s just paying for outdated tricks. Nothing new here.
---
I’ve fallen into the borderline traffic trap myself—conversion was a complete disaster, and I seriously regret it.
---
Project teams are still thinking about this? Wake up, the market has already voted.
Some traffic channels simply can’t support the conversion demand of this market cycle.
Earlier, I personally tested this by hiring Jingxiang, who is somewhat well-known in the industry, and her friend to run ads. The result? The conversion rate was nearly zero. Even someone from a top exchange privately admitted that “pretty girl” or borderline content traffic looks lively on the surface, but the actual conversions are disastrously low.
Even small-scale operators like me can’t be bothered with these channels anymore—the data speaks for itself, and the input-output ratio simply doesn’t add up. To put it bluntly: projects that are still throwing their budgets in this direction are basically paying a “stupidity tax.” The market has already proven the answer with real money; stop hoping for miracles.