Economist Nicholas Lardy's making a bold call: he's projecting China's economy will outpace the US by at least 2x over the next three to five years. His take? The convergence story isn't dead—China's still closing the gap on total economic output.
What's interesting here is his rejection of the middle-income trap narrative. That's the theory where developing economies stall out before reaching advanced status. Lardy clearly doesn't buy it for China's case.
For those tracking macro trends and capital flows, this kind of divergence in growth trajectories tends to reshape where institutional money moves. Worth watching how this plays out.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 12-06 01:41
2x? Bro, that's way too optimistic of a prediction. The Chinese economy is indeed strong, but that number seems a bit far-fetched.
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 12-05 14:04
This guy Lardy just wants to get famous, huh? 2x? Just say it straight, that's an exaggeration.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 12-05 14:02
2x growth rate? Sounds pretty unrealistic, let's look at the data.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegen
· 12-05 13:56
nah lardy's smoking something if he thinks 2x in 3-5 years lol... but honestly? bullish cope or not i'm aping in anyway ser
Economist Nicholas Lardy's making a bold call: he's projecting China's economy will outpace the US by at least 2x over the next three to five years. His take? The convergence story isn't dead—China's still closing the gap on total economic output.
What's interesting here is his rejection of the middle-income trap narrative. That's the theory where developing economies stall out before reaching advanced status. Lardy clearly doesn't buy it for China's case.
For those tracking macro trends and capital flows, this kind of divergence in growth trajectories tends to reshape where institutional money moves. Worth watching how this plays out.