Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Behind S&P's Downgrade of Tether: The Battle Over Stablecoin Reserves Emerges

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Crypto World] S&P recently downgraded Tether’s reserve rating to the “weak” category, sparking quite a bit of discussion in the industry. An analysis team from an international bank even released a report, pointing out that this exposes a major weakness of stablecoins—the ever-present risk of depegging, which is not as much of a concern for other tokenized assets.

What’s the core issue? It’s the same old problem: reserve structure. Stablecoin issuers must ensure they can always handle a potential run, which means their reserves need to be highly liquid and low risk. However, on Tether’s side, the proportion of high-risk assets in their reserves is increasing, and it’s no longer made up solely of cash and short-term US Treasuries. This directly impacts whether users can redeem smoothly when they want to cash out.

From a regulatory perspective, regulators around the world are now emphasizing the importance of transparency and high-quality liquid assets. With this trend, stablecoins like USDC, which have higher ratings and stronger compliance, may be more favored by institutional investors. This could subtly change the market landscape.

USDC-0.01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizervip
· 12-03 15:50
To be honest, this depends on the data. In terms of transparency, Tether’s asset allocation does fall short compared to USDC’s standardized model. But as for the “weak” rating, I’d like to see exactly how S&P calculated it—what proportion of high-risk assets is considered excessive? 20% or 30%? Without concrete data to back up the rating, its reference value is limited.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePaintervip
· 12-03 15:46
actually the algorithmic beauty here is how tether's reserve composition reveals the topological fragility of centralized stablecoin primitives... like, s&p's downgrade isn't just financial theater, it's exposing the computational debt that accumulates when you abandon pure liquidity optimization for yield-chasing aesthetics. the hash value of trust literally depends on reserve purity lol
Reply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 12-03 15:42
Good morning, 2 a.m... Is Tether playing the liquidity trap game again? The rising proportion of high-risk assets basically means their reserves are being eaten away. When a real run comes, people will realize there’s nothing but bones left in the pot at redemption. Meanwhile, USDC is happily enjoying regulatory advantages on the sidelines—how ironic.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleShadowvip
· 12-03 15:39
How much longer can USDT hold on? I think this time we really need to take a good look at what tricks they're playing with the reserves.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 12-03 15:37
Here we go again, USDT really stepped into a trap this time... More and more high-risk assets—aren’t they just playing with fire?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterXvip
· 12-03 15:24
Tether is at it again? High-risk assets are still increasing, the risk of depegging could explode any day now.
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacyvip
· 12-03 15:24
honestly the whole "reserve composition" thing feels like governance theater at this point... like yeah, s&p downgraded tether but tbh their framework's arguably been playing catch-up all along. path dependency is real here—once you're positioned as the convenient option, stakeholder alignment becomes... non-trivial to disrupt. usdc's compliance premium is real tho, ngl
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)