Pump2 has only been online for half a month, and its data performance has already started to crush the first generation version.
To be honest, if there is a team that can fully understand the flywheel effect of the launch mechanism—creating a positive feedback loop for token prices instead of the current one-way extraction—then the entire launchpad sector might need to be reshuffled. The original $PUMP model has already exposed too many issues, and the market needs smarter tokenomics design.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 5h ago
Half a month and it's already crushing? Has the blood drawing model really changed this time or is it just a different way of saying it to continue play people for suckers?
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 5h ago
It looks like another "new version crushing the old version" story, and I always think about those coins I bought at a high position during times like this...
To be honest, achieving the true flywheel effect is not that easy; it's all just talk. I understand the one-way blood-sucking routine of the original $PUMP very well because I was the one being drained. Pump2 has good-looking data right now, but it's likely just the relay effect of this wave of new suckers; we'll see when the sentiment indicator approaches a MACD death cross.
tokenomics is smart, but everything is in vain in the face of market cycles; in the end, we still have to see if there's a head and shoulders pattern on the technical side.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 5h ago
I have experienced it all. The original Pump was just a rebranded Ponzi scheme, and the data for Pump 2 looks good, but it's just because the fresh blood hasn't run out yet. Let's wait three months and see. Flywheel effect? I've heard too much about this BTC since 2018, and in the end, it always ends with the project party doing a rug pull.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClass
· 5h ago
lmao pump2 crushing v1 in half a month? *checks historical charts* ...this is literally the exact playbook we saw with every failed launchpad iteration since 2021. they always look brilliant in month one, then the tokenomics collapses under its own weight. pattern recognition go brrrr.
Reply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 5h ago
Half a month to completely surpass the first generation, this pace is a bit ruthless
---
The flywheel effect sounds good, but it still relies on the team to really get it done
---
good tokenomics design is the real way to go, otherwise, no matter how fancy, it’s useless
---
This one-way blood extraction method should have been eliminated long ago, really looking forward to who can break the deadlock
---
With Pump2's data being so strong, the first generation really needs to reflect
---
People talk about reshuffling every day, the key is who has the strength
---
Positive cycles sound beautiful, but the difficulty of implementation is the real challenge
---
There are so many exposed issues with the first generation, why are there still people playing
---
tokenomics in this area really needs smarter designs, it’s too disappointing now
---
Half a month of crushing indicates that the market really lacks this thing
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetire
· 5h ago
Half a month to crush the first generation? How long will it take to land this?
Pump2 has only been online for half a month, and its data performance has already started to crush the first generation version.
To be honest, if there is a team that can fully understand the flywheel effect of the launch mechanism—creating a positive feedback loop for token prices instead of the current one-way extraction—then the entire launchpad sector might need to be reshuffled. The original $PUMP model has already exposed too many issues, and the market needs smarter tokenomics design.