2025 Stablecoin Ecosystem Overview: Comparison of Four Major Mechanisms + Mainstream Token Testing

2025-11-22 19:28:41

Stablecoins have evolved from a niche tool into the infrastructure of the crypto market. As of now, the total market cap of all stablecoins has surpassed $212 billion, with over 200 stablecoin projects in operation. How exactly does this ecosystem work? Today, let’s dive deep.

Four Types of Stablecoins

1. Fiat-collateralized (Most Conservative)

The most common are USDT, USDC, and the like—1:1 pegged to the US dollar, backed by real USD reserves. USDT’s market cap has reached $140 billion, distributed across 109 million wallets. This type is the most stable, but the risks are clear: reliance on issuer transparency and constant regulatory risk.

2. Commodity-collateralized (Backed by Physical Assets)

PAX Gold, Tether Gold, etc.—each token represents 1 ounce of real gold and silver locked in a vault. The advantage is hard asset backing; the downside is poor liquidity, high withdrawal fees, and commodity price volatility can affect stability.

3. Crypto-collateralized (Highly Digitalized)

The model of DAI, sUSD—using ETH and other coins as collateral, maintaining stability through over-collateralization. This type is the most decentralized, but requires 150-200% over-collateralization (e.g., locking $1,500 of ETH to mint $1,000 of DAI), which means lower capital efficiency. There’s also the need to guard against smart contract risks and liquidation caused by rapid drops in collateral value.

4. Algorithmic (Most Innovative, Also Most Dangerous)

Ampleforth, the former UST—these rely on algorithms to regulate supply and maintain price, without direct collateral. In essence, it’s a game of market psychology. As we all know, Luna/UST collapsed in 2022, causing heavy investor losses. Market confidence in this type has now dropped significantly.

Stablecoin Matrix: Who’s Leading the Pack

Project	Market Cap	Type	Highlights
USDT(Tether)	~$140B	Fiat-collateralized	The largest, but reserve sufficiency has always been questioned
USDC(Circle)	~$42B	Fiat-collateralized	More transparent, more institutionally recognized
RLUSD(Ripple)	$53M+	Fiat-collateralized	Newly launched (Dec), focused on payments
USDe(Ethena)	~$6B	Yield-bearing	Climbed to third tier in 10 months, innovative delta-neutral hedging
DAI(MakerDAO)	~$5.3B	Crypto-collateralized	DeFi infrastructure, highest degree of decentralization
FDUSD(First Digital)	~$1.3B	Fiat-collateralized	Issued in Hong Kong, surpassed $1B in half a year
PYUSD(PayPal)	~$494M	Fiat-collateralized	Large user base but slow adoption
USD0(Usual)	~$1.2B	Physical asset-backed	Collateralized by US Treasuries, rising star of 2024

The most interesting model is USDe—it’s not a simple collateral model, but uses a combination of staking ETH and shorting ETH on exchanges in a delta-neutral strategy to maintain stability while generating yield for users. This approach has attracted many yield-seeking users. In December, Ethena also launched USDtb (collateralized by BlackRock’s BUIDL fund), further reducing risk.

Why Stablecoins Are So Popular

Market Situation: BTC has broken above the $100,000 mark, kicking off a new bull cycle and surging trading volume. This makes stablecoins crucial:

Standard trading pairs — Switching from BTC to stablecoins on exchanges avoids fiat on/off ramps, reducing friction
Cross-border payments — A stablecoin transfer is much faster and cheaper than SWIFT
DeFi collateral — In lending protocols like Aave and Compound, stablecoins are the largest trading pairs
Safe haven — When the market turns, quickly moving into stablecoins is like holding “cash” in digital assets
Financial inclusion — In regions with underdeveloped banking, stablecoins = accessible digital banking

Risk Checklist (Must Read)

Regulatory clampdown — The US Treasury, FSOC, and others are ramping up scrutiny on stablecoins, concerned about financial stability. Some highly regulated countries have already started restricting stablecoins.

Reserve sufficiency — USDT has long faced doubts about whether reserves are truly adequate. USDC is more transparent but also requires ongoing verification.

Technical risk — Code bugs, contract exploits, and cross-chain security issues can all lead to funds being locked or lost.

Centralization dilemma — Fiat-backed stablecoins require a centralized issuer, which contradicts the core crypto decentralization philosophy.

De-pegging risk — In extreme market conditions (e.g., bank runs), stablecoins may lose their peg. UST is a vivid example.

Conclusion

Stablecoins have become the lifeblood of the crypto market, but not all stablecoins are the same. Fiat-backed USDT/USDC are the most stable but also the most centralized; DAI is extremely decentralized but requires over-collateralization; USDe, USD0 and other new types try to balance yield and stability.

Looking ahead to 2025: Will there be a true global stablecoin standard? How disruptive will CBDCs be? Will DeFi stablecoins replace fiat-backed stablecoins as the mainstream?

To participate in the stablecoin ecosystem, the key is to understand the pros and cons of each mechanism. Don’t blindly chase new things, because the most innovative products often come with the highest risks.

USDC-0,02%

PAXG1,32%

XAUT1,34%

DAI-0,02%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.