
A token or platform where trading or withdrawals are restricted.
In the crypto space, "Pixiu" refers to mechanisms or situations where you can buy in but cannot sell, or deposit but cannot withdraw. The term is inspired by the mythical beast known for "swallowing gold but never spitting it out," and it often appears in the design of malicious tokens or on non-compliant platforms that permanently suspend withdrawals or set withdrawal conditions that are nearly impossible to meet.
Knowing about Pixiu helps you avoid scams and maintain liquidity.
If your funds get trapped in a Pixiu environment, you may be unable to sell your tokens or transfer assets, missing market opportunities or even losing your entire investment. This risk is common when trading new tokens, participating in on-chain launches, making cross-chain transfers, or using unfamiliar platforms. Early identification and small-scale testing can turn large losses into manageable trial costs.
Pixiu restricts selling or withdrawals through contract code or platform rules.
At the smart contract level, malicious tokens may limit the "sell" function—for example, by blacklisting certain addresses, allowing only whitelisted users to sell, imposing extremely high sell taxes (such as 90%), or adding fail conditions to key trading paths so that sell orders are always rejected. Some projects disguise these restrictions as "anti-bot" or "anti-sniping" measures but actually use them to block retail users from selling.
On exchanges, Pixiu appears as long-term suspension of withdrawals, unreasonably high minimum withdrawal amounts, withdrawal fees far above normal on-chain levels, or pausing withdrawals during critical periods while still allowing deposits and purchases—causing net capital inflow with no practical way to exit.
At the liquidity layer, project teams may create one-sided liquidity pools or withdraw liquidity at any time, leading to extreme slippage and failed sell orders. Some projects set the sellable amount so low that you can only withdraw a symbolic sum.
Pixiu can appear in on-chain tokens, exchanges, and liquidity pools.
In on-chain token trading, the common symptom is that buy orders go through but sell orders consistently fail, or you are prompted to set an extremely high slippage. Reviewing the contract may reveal excessive sell taxes, blacklist switches, or manually coded failure conditions in transaction functions.
On centralized platforms, Pixiu means "deposits allowed but withdrawals blocked": websites display maintenance notices, claim insufficient funds, require repeated KYC checks with no timeline. Compliant exchanges like Gate conduct risk assessments and contract audits before listing, with transparent announcements for deposit, trading, and withdrawal windows—any anomalies are clearly explained. If an unknown platform lacks a clear withdrawal policy or customer support deflects responsibility, be highly cautious.
In liquidity pools, if LP (liquidity provision) is fully controlled by the project team and not locked, they can remove liquidity at any time, causing drastic price swings and making it impossible to sell. Monitoring pool lock status and holding distribution can help identify risks early.
Real-world examples: On some new meme coins on BSC, there is zero tax at launch but suddenly an 80% sell tax is imposed and large holders are blacklisted; on obscure exchanges, USDT deposits are instant but withdrawals remain queued for days without approval.
Use tools, small-scale testing, official channels, and information verification to significantly reduce risk.
Step 1: Use detection tools. Popular options like Honeypot.is, GoPlus, and Dedaub Risk Scanner can highlight high sell taxes, blacklists/whitelists, and suspicious permissions. If you see warnings about "high sell tax" or "transaction failure risk," proceed with caution.
Step 2: Small-scale test trades and reverse testing. Start with minimal amounts to test whether you can actually sell before increasing your position; on centralized platforms, deposit a small amount first and then try withdrawing a small amount to confirm the channel is reliable.
Step 3: Review key contract points. Check if the contract allows tax rate changes at any time, if selling is restricted to whitelisted addresses only, or if minting and blacklist permissions are retained; focus on permissions and logic rather than just function names.
Step 4: Examine liquidity and holdings. See if LP tokens are locked, for how long, and if managed by a third party; check concentration among top token holders—highly concentrated and freely transferable holdings indicate higher risk.
Step 5: Prioritize official channels. Beginners should stick to established exchanges (like Gate) with mature risk controls for spot trading and investment products; follow platform announcements for deposit/withdrawal windows and rules. For on-chain trades, set reasonable slippage and limit orders to avoid excessive taxes or slippage losses.
Step 6: Assess project transparency. Review whitepapers, audit reports, team info, and social media updates; be wary of marketing that says "only buy, no sell" or support that urges more deposits—cut your losses quickly if these appear.
Recent data shows honeypots and withdrawal restrictions remain prevalent but are evolving structurally.
Q3 2025 data indicates that public security dashboards still flag most "honeypot/non-sellable tokens" on BSC and Ethereum—BSC accounts for about 60%-70% depending on the source. Each month over the past six months has seen 500–1,200 new suspicious token addresses flagged, with peaks during new narrative or meme coin booms.
By type, in the past six months of 2025, "high sell tax (≥50%)" and "whitelist-only sales" together accounted for about 30%, a slight decrease from all of 2024—likely due to increased tool adoption improving detection and blocking rates. Rug-pulls via sudden liquidity removal spike during volatile market periods (notably May–June and October–November).
For centralized platforms, this year complaints about "withdrawal limits on small platforms" have become concentrated among a few non-transparent exchanges; top-tier platforms have reduced negative sentiment by strengthening risk controls and transparency compared to 2024. These figures reference public dashboards and community statistics; interpret them alongside their respective sources due to varying definitions.
Honeypots are mainly at the contract level; Pixiu is broader.
A honeypot typically refers to a smart contract trap where buying is easy but selling is difficult or impossible—usually enforced through blacklists/whitelists, high sell taxes, or intentional transaction failures. Pixiu is a broader slang term encompassing not only honeypot tokens but also withdrawal restrictions on centralized platforms and liquidity pool issues (like one-sided pools or sudden liquidity removal) that trap funds in more scenarios.
So if you encounter an on-chain token you cannot sell, it’s likely a honeypot; if a platform allows deposits but blocks withdrawals, it’s best described as Pixiu. While identification methods differ, both center around protecting liquidity: always verify you can sell or withdraw before participating.
As a traditional cultural ornament, folklore suggests that people with certain zodiac signs or birth charts should avoid wearing Pixiu—consult an expert for personal advice rather than following trends blindly. In crypto, however, all users face risks from Pixiu projects; rational judgment is essential.
In Chinese mythology, Pixiu is one of the nine sons of the Dragon King. In crypto slang, the term describes projects that absorb funds unilaterally with no way out. Understanding its cultural background helps identify similar risk traps in crypto markets.
Traditional beliefs vary regarding ornament numbers—but in crypto investing this is irrelevant. The real priority is learning how to identify project fundamentals: examine code audits, team backgrounds, and liquidity mechanisms to judge for "Pixiu" (one-way flow) features.
Pixiu projects often show these signs: tokens keep falling in value but cannot be sold; teams disappear (rug-pull); smart contracts contain hidden restrictions (like sell limits). Check contract code, community feedback, and verify team identity before committing funds. Trading on reputable platforms like Gate offers additional protection.
Beginners often lack blockchain knowledge and fall for Pixiu traps—project teams use fake marketing, community hype, and celebrity endorsements to create false trust. To protect yourself: learn smart contract basics, verify information sources, be wary of promises of high returns, and prefer platforms with strong risk controls.


