
A subnet in the blockchain context refers to an independently operating network or execution environment that is separated by rules and resources within a shared ecosystem. Similar to a “subnet segment” in traditional networking, a blockchain subnet is essentially a small chain capable of producing its own blocks, managing transaction fees, and handling governance autonomously.
In traditional internet architecture, subnets divide a large network into smaller segments for easier management and isolation. Within blockchain, the relationship between subnets and the mainnet is akin to independent zones within a larger campus: they share core infrastructure and entry points, but internal roads, access controls, and rules can be customized. Common implementations include Avalanche’s Subnets, Polygon’s Supernets, and similar “Appchain” ecosystems such as Cosmos Zones and Polkadot Parachains.
Subnets address scaling and differentiation needs by allowing applications to have their own throughput, fee structure, and operational rules. As user demand grows, forcing all activity onto the mainnet leads to congestion and increased transaction costs.
For developers, subnets offer:
For users, subnets can deliver faster and cheaper experiences for specific applications while reducing the impact of network-wide congestion.
Subnets are typically maintained by a group of “validators” responsible for block production and transaction verification. Validators are nodes that collectively maintain the ledger and determine transaction order using a consensus algorithm to ensure data consistency.
Most subnets feature several key components:
For example, gaming-focused subnets may have shorter block times and lower fees to ensure smooth player transactions without interference from other apps; finance-oriented subnets might implement permissioned participation so only KYC-verified institutional nodes can join.
While all three technologies aim to improve scalability, their architectures differ. Subnets function as “independent chains” with customizable security and rules; sharding is “horizontal partitioning within a single chain,” where shards share the main chain’s security; rollups “bundle transactions for settlement on the mainnet,” with security primarily anchored to the main chain.
For beginners: Think of subnets as “adjacent campuses,” shards as “zones within one campus,” and rollups as “outsourcing processes that return results to headquarters.”
Subnet interoperability typically relies on two methods: asset bridges and message passing.
As of 2025, leading ecosystems prioritize non-custodial message interoperability and cryptographic proofs to reduce cross-chain attack surfaces. Users should always follow official documentation for cross-network operations.
Subnets grant applications and organizations a “dedicated lane” with “customizable rules.” For developers, this translates to enhanced performance, controllable fees, and customizable execution environments; for enterprises, it means clear compliance boundaries, access control, and data segregation.
Teams may opt for EVM-compatible subnets for rapid smart contract migration or build custom execution environments using modular frameworks.
The key principle is “network compatibility.” The same token may exist on multiple networks, and some projects operate only on specific subnets. Depositing assets into an incompatible network may result in loss.
Step 1: Check the project documentation for network name and chain ID. The chain ID uniquely identifies each network.
Step 2: Verify network details in your wallet. Ensure the network name, chain ID, and block explorer link match those in the project docs.
Step 3: On Gate’s deposit page, select the correct network. If you cannot find the specified subnet or network name, do not proceed; contact the project team or Gate customer service for confirmation.
Step 4: Always test with a small amount before transferring large sums. For cross-subnet transfers, use official or project-endorsed bridges rather than unknown third-party tools.
Following these steps significantly reduces risks associated with network mismatches, incompatible addresses, or vulnerable bridge contracts.
The primary risks of subnets include security variances, bridge vulnerabilities, and fragmented liquidity. Smaller validator sets can increase risks of reorganization or censorship; bridges are high-value targets with a history of exploits; dividing ecosystems may lead to scattered assets and users, impacting depth and usability. Additionally, governance changes or upgrades can cause brief downtime.
Looking ahead to 2025, ecosystems are moving towards modularity and composability: shared sequencers, cross-subnet messaging, unified account abstraction, and improved developer toolchains are maturing. It’s expected that future subnets will function as “pluggable business domains,” maintaining customization while leveraging standardized protocols for seamless interoperability with both mainnet and other subnets.
Overall, subnets offer practical solutions for scaling and industry-specific customization but require careful attention to security and reliability during deployment. Correct network selection in exchanges and wallets is crucial for stable operations.
A subnet is an independently operating environment within a blockchain network managed by its own validator nodes. It processes transactions and smart contracts separately while maintaining secure connections to the mainnet. Subnets are ideal for projects requiring tailored performance or governance.
The mainnet is the core blockchain network; subnets are independent chains attached to it. While subnets rely on the mainnet’s security validation, they control their own transaction processing and rules. Simply put, the mainnet is headquarters; subnets are branch offices.
To create a subnet, you need to deploy validator nodes and configure consensus mechanisms along with governance parameters. Most platforms have lowered the entry barrier so even smaller projects can launch subnets. Exchanges like Gate offer subnet ecosystem support to help new projects get started quickly.
Generally, transaction fees on subnets are lower due to fewer validators and less congestion. However, actual costs depend on each subnet’s design and network conditions. Choosing an appropriate subnet can significantly reduce transaction expenses.
Asset safety on subnets depends on validator quality and consensus design. Well-established projects tend to offer more secure subnets while smaller ones may carry higher risk. It’s recommended to transact only on reputable platforms like Gate-supported subnets—and always keep your private keys secure.


