
A merged miner is a participant who uses the same set of hardware and hash power to simultaneously mine blocks on multiple Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains. The core concept is that a single computation can fulfill the validation rules of several chains at once, allowing the miner to earn rewards from multiple networks.
Hash power refers to the computational strength of mining equipment, which performs vast numbers of random calculations to find valid solutions; Proof of Work is a consensus mechanism where miners compete to solve complex mathematical problems, and the first to find a valid answer can package a block and earn rewards. Merged miners use mining pools or software that support merged mining, submitting their work to multiple compatible chains simultaneously.
Merged mining emerged to increase miner profitability and enhance blockchain security. For miners, earning rewards from multiple chains with the same power consumption is more attractive. For auxiliary chains, leveraging the hash power of a primary chain increases block production security and resistance to attacks.
Previously, smaller PoW blockchains struggled to attract enough hash power, making them vulnerable to attacks. By introducing merged mining, these chains can share a larger pool of hash power, improving block stability without requiring miners to sacrifice primary chain rewards for supporting smaller networks.
The principle behind merged mining is embedding the “proof” from a single mining process into structures recognizable by multiple blockchains. The valid hash calculated by the mining device is included in the primary chain’s block header and linked to the auxiliary chain through additional data. Mining pools submit results to each chain accordingly.
A block header acts as a “block summary,” recording information such as timestamp and difficulty target. In merged mining, auxiliary chains allow referencing the primary chain’s proof of work within their rules, recognizing that proof as satisfying their own difficulty and validity standards. Historically, Bitcoin and Namecoin used this approach; in practice, Litecoin and Dogecoin have long utilized merged mining, enabling miners to earn rewards from both chains using the same hash power.
To configure merged mining, miners typically use mining pools that support this feature. The basic steps are as follows:
Step 1: Confirm Equipment and Algorithm. Select hardware and algorithms compatible with the target chains; for example, machines designed for the Scrypt algorithm are suitable for mining Litecoin and Dogecoin simultaneously.
Step 2: Choose a Mining Pool. Select a pool that explicitly supports merged mining and review its fee structure, distribution rules, and stability.
Step 3: Set Up Connection Information. Configure your miner with the Stratum address provided by the pool and enter wallet addresses for both the primary and auxiliary chains for reward distribution.
Step 4: Test Submission and Monitor Rejection Rate. Start with a small-scale run to monitor “rejected shares” and latency, ensuring stable connectivity between your network and the pool.
Step 5: Launch and Monitor. After going live, continuously monitor hash power distribution across chains, pool block production, and earnings settlement; adjust your mining pool or strategies as needed.
The chains that merged miners can mine depend on algorithm compatibility and protocol support. The most common example is Litecoin and Dogecoin—both use the Scrypt algorithm and support merged mining, so they can be mined together using the same equipment.
Historically, Bitcoin and Namecoin demonstrated merged mining between different chains by sharing proof of work. In practice, combinations with compatible algorithms and clear merged mining rules are the most stable; miners should consult updated support lists from both chains and pools.
Merged miner profits are calculated as “primary chain rewards + auxiliary chain rewards – total costs.” Rewards from each chain depend on block rewards, token prices, and probability of finding a block; total costs include electricity, hardware depreciation, pool fees, and maintenance expenses.
To estimate returns, calculate expected output per unit of hash power based on network difficulty and total hash rate, then multiply by token price for daily revenue—do this separately for both primary and auxiliary chains. For costs, multiply device power consumption by electricity rates for daily energy costs, adding pool fees and hardware depreciation. Merged mining typically increases overall revenue without significantly raising energy usage, but pool fees and auxiliary chain block stability still affect final returns.
Merged miners face both technical and financial risks. On the technical side, unstable mining pools can raise rejection rates and reduce actual profits; if an auxiliary chain’s protocol or implementation is immature, reorganization risks may threaten reward payouts. Financially, lack of transparency in pool settlement or custody can result in payout delays or even losses.
For security best practices:
After earning multi-chain rewards, merged miners can deposit assets into Gate for unified management and trading. It is important to credit each asset via its respective deposit network to avoid incorrect deposits on unsupported networks.
On Gate, merged miners can use spot trading to convert their rewards into desired assets or allocate some funds into earning or liquidity products for greater capital efficiency. During periods of high volatility, grid trading tools can automate trades within set price ranges to reduce manual oversight. All operations should be tailored to personal risk tolerance with careful attention to account security settings.
The key difference lies in how hash power is utilized. Traditional miners dedicate their hash power to a single blockchain; merged miners use the same hash power across two or more chains simultaneously, aiming for multiple rewards without significantly increasing energy consumption.
In terms of operations, merged miners rely more on pools supporting merged mining and require more nuanced configuration. Monitoring expands from “single-chain output” to “multi-chain combined yield and stability,” demanding more detailed strategies and risk management.
In recent years, merged mining has primarily been used to boost security and appeal for smaller PoW chains. The most mature implementations remain among algorithm-compatible chains with strong community consensus. As mining pools and related tools evolve, entry barriers for merged miners are decreasing; however, profitability differences will widen with token price fluctuations and network difficulty changes.
From an industry perspective, merged mining represents a long-term “resource reuse” strategy: during periods of market volatility or declining single-chain returns, merged miners can smooth out earnings across multiple chains; when new chains explore merged mechanisms, early adopters may receive additional incentives but must carefully assess protocol maturity and security.
At its core, merged mining allows miners to serve multiple PoW chains simultaneously with the same hash power by leveraging merged mining protocols—turning a single effective solution into multiple rewards. In practice, choosing compatible chains and stable pools, configuring access and monitoring carefully, and methodically calculating profits and costs are key to achieving robust results. Beginners should start with small-scale tests, gradually optimize rejection rates and payout efficiency, and diversify asset management on Gate while enhancing security settings—converting technical advantages into sustainable financial performance.
Merged mining does not require special hardware. You can participate using a standard computer or existing mining rig. As long as you install compatible mining software configured for a pool that supports merged mining (such as Gate's pool service), you can contribute hash power to multiple chains at once. The main focus should be choosing a stable pool and optimizing software settings—the hardware itself has no special requirements.
The main risks of merged mining include changes in mining difficulty, rising electricity costs, and income fluctuations due to poor pool selection. However, if your electricity costs are low and you choose a reputable pool (such as Gate), risks are manageable. It is recommended to start with a small investment, monitor your real-time profit-to-cost ratio closely, and stop immediately if earnings fail to cover electricity expenses.
The coins you can mine depend on your configuration but are typically major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or Litecoin. All these coins can be traded or withdrawn directly on the Gate platform. It’s recommended to bind your mining pool payouts directly to your Gate account so that mined coins are credited automatically—making management and trading easier without extra transfers.
This is normal behavior. Merged mining yields are influenced by several factors: block difficulty adjusts roughly every two weeks; network congestion affects block times; more miners joining will dilute individual rewards. Additionally, pool fees and token price volatility will also impact income. While short-term fluctuations are common, long-term participation reveals average earnings trends—short-term swings are not cause for undue concern.
Merged mining is a passive way to earn crypto assets but should not replace professional investment advice. Essentially, it converts electricity costs into cryptocurrency returns—earnings depend on power rates, hardware depreciation, and market conditions. If you’re unsure about your risk tolerance, consult professionals before participating; develop a plan that matches your risk profile rather than blindly following trends.


