
A hard peg refers to fixing the value of one asset strictly to the price of another asset.
This mechanism tightly anchors the price of an asset to a reference asset at a fixed ratio, most commonly seen in stablecoins pegged 1:1 to the US dollar. Maintaining a hard peg typically involves robust collateral reserves, on-demand redemption channels (allowing users to exchange tokens for equivalent USD or other assets), and proactive market maker intervention to correct deviations from the target price.
On-chain and within exchanges, hard pegs enable predictable settlement, making them essential for pricing, hedging volatility, and representing cross-chain mapped assets (such as WBTC representing Bitcoin).
It determines whether the "1 unit" you hold is truly worth "1".
If you use stablecoins for trading, investing, or cross-chain transfers, the ability to redeem at a 1:1 ratio directly impacts your purchasing power and risk exposure. Hard pegs provide stability for pricing, yield calculations, and margin conversions, making them suitable for arbitrage, accounting, and payroll scenarios where "rigid value" is essential.
For institutions and developers, hard pegs are the foundation for designing payment and settlement systems. For regular users, a hard peg is the primary standard when selecting stablecoins or "pegged assets".
A hard peg relies on "redeemability, active price correction, and accessible entry/exit channels".
Reserves and Redemption: Issuers maintain reserves equal in value to circulating tokens (such as USD cash, government bonds, or highly liquid assets). Users can return tokens to the issuer for equivalent assets, establishing a price floor. Redemption works like exchanging a ticket: 1 stablecoin can be swapped for $1 or an asset of similar value.
Minting/Burning and Market Making: Minting and burning refer to issuing and withdrawing tokens. When market price exceeds $1, market makers or arbitrage traders mint and sell tokens to push prices down; if below $1, they buy and redeem tokens to drive prices up. Market makers act like supermarket managers adjusting prices and restocking shelves to minimize discrepancies.
Price Signals and Risk Management: Most projects set target prices, deviation thresholds, and risk controls—for example, limiting large minting operations, increasing transparency, or temporarily raising redemption requirements during extreme conditions to prevent "bank runs".
The most direct example is the 1:1 relationship between stablecoins and "pegged tokens".
On centralized exchanges like Gate's spot markets, trading pairs such as USDT/USDC usually fluctuate narrowly around 1:1. If deviations of 0.3%–1% occur, market makers and arbitrageurs quickly correct the spread through "buy low, sell high" strategies.
On-chain, tokens like WBTC (wrapped Bitcoin) are issued after custodial storage of Bitcoin, claiming 1 WBTC equals 1 BTC—users can redeem WBTC from the custodian. "Pegged" assets on cross-chain bridges operate similarly but their safety depends on the custody or bridge mechanism.
In payment and settlement scenarios, hard pegs ensure unified pricing and settlement. For example, in contract trading margin conversion, different stablecoins are valued at 1:1 to simplify reconciliation.
First, confirm whether you can actually "redeem for real assets".
Verify Redemption and Reserve Transparency: Choose stablecoins with clear redemption processes and third-party audits or reserve disclosures. Understand what types of assets support redemption and the processing time. Without transparent redemption, value promises are weaker.
Diversification and Deviation Tolerance: Hold multiple stablecoins to diversify risk and set acceptable deviation thresholds. For instance, prioritize fiat-backed stablecoins for payments and margin, while allocating yield-focused assets to higher-risk but compensated products.
Exchange Order Management: Use limit orders on Gate to control slippage; split orders during short-term deviations. Monitor spreads between USDT/USDC, USDT/fiat, or USDT/major coins to avoid chasing prices during high volatility.
Contingency Planning for Extreme Events: Maintain some channels for direct fiat redemption. Understand how projects handle service suspension, banking holidays, or network congestion; switch settlement currencies temporarily if needed.
Risk signals include delayed redemptions, reserve concerns, regulatory freezes, bridge hacks, or market maker withdrawal. If these arise, reduce exposure and increase cash holdings.
This year has seen "small deviations and large scale" for stablecoins and pegged assets.
In 2024, USDT circulation surpassed 100 billion tokens, with USDC market cap rebounding into tens of billions. Overall stablecoin supply resumed growth, providing ample liquidity for trading and settlement in 2025.
Over the past year, mainstream fiat-backed stablecoins generally deviated less than ±0.5% from their peg daily; during liquidity events this occasionally widened to about 1%–2%, but was subsequently corrected via redemption and market making. Q3 2025 public panels and exchange data show stablecoins retain a high share of total trading volume with increasing on-chain settlements and cross-chain usage.
At the same time, the security of cross-chain bridges and pegged assets is under scrutiny: many projects are improving custody transparency and redemption processes as the market favors hard peg models with strong custody and audit standards.
A hard peg emphasizes "redeemability and active price correction", while a soft peg aims only to "stay close".
A hard peg relies on real reserves and redemption mechanisms with tight price fluctuations around the target; soft pegs primarily use algorithms or incentives to stay near the target price but allow larger deviations. For example, algorithmic stablecoins may lose their peg under stress, while fiat-backed stablecoins—though sometimes temporarily off-target—can usually be restored through redemption.
Consider three factors when choosing: whether there is sufficient verifiable reserve; whether there is a clear and always-available redemption channel; how wide and quickly deviations were corrected during historical stress events.
Stablecoins require hard pegs to ensure price stability. By pegging to fiat currencies like the US dollar, stablecoins eliminate volatility risk so users can hold and transact with confidence. On platforms like Gate, hard-pegged stablecoins (such as USDT and USDC) serve as major settlement currencies for trading pairs.
If a hard peg fails, the currency loses its anchor to the target value and cannot maintain its set exchange rate. Historically, some stablecoins have dropped below $0.90, causing user losses. This highlights the importance of considering issuer credibility and reserve strength when choosing stablecoins.
Evaluate three aspects: First, check if the issuer has strong reputation backing (e.g., Tether, Circle). Second, verify whether independent audits confirm adequate reserves. Third, monitor whether market prices remain close to $1. Before trading on Gate, review real-time premium data for stablecoins.
CBDCs usually represent the strongest form of hard peg since they are issued and guaranteed directly by central banks (e.g., China’s digital yuan is equivalent in value to RMB). Compared with private stablecoins, CBDCs have minimal depegging risk but currently have limited use cases.
The main ones include USD stablecoins (USDT, USDC, BUSD), Euro stablecoins (EUROC), and other fiat-backed coins—all listed on leading exchanges like Gate. Note that each has distinct pegging mechanisms: USDT relies on Tether’s reserves while USDC is issued by Circle—risk assessments should account for these differences.


