
A theoretical market capitalization calculated based on the total token supply.
Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) is determined by multiplying the current token price by the total number of tokens that will ever exist, including those yet to be unlocked—such as team allocations, ecosystem rewards, and other tokens scheduled for future release. Think of it as valuing a company by the entire warehouse inventory, not just what is currently on the store shelves.
For example, if a token is priced at $2 with a total supply of 1 billion, the FDV would be $2 billion. If only 100 million tokens are currently circulating, then the circulating market cap is $200 million—a tenfold difference between the two metrics.
FDV helps you spot projects that may seem “cheap” but are actually expensive when considering future token unlocks.
Many newly issued tokens have a low circulating supply, so their price can be easily driven up by small trades. Looking only at unit price or circulating market cap might make a project appear affordable, but FDV accounts for all tokens that will eventually enter circulation, offering early insight into potential sell pressure and realistic valuation ranges.
For projects with high private allocation, long vesting periods, or those newly listed on exchanges, FDV serves as a more reliable benchmark for comparing size and pricing across similar projects.
FDV depends on two main factors: price and total supply.
FDV = Current Price × Total Token Supply.
A key factor in interpreting FDV is “vesting.” Vesting refers to locked tokens gradually becoming available for trading according to a schedule. Common scenarios include team and early investor vesting periods, periodic ecosystem reward distributions, or emission from fees and mining rewards. Unlocking increases circulating supply and can introduce additional selling pressure. Therefore, even with the same FDV, the pace of unlocking can have varying short-term impacts on price.
A practical four-step approach:
FDV is most relevant for newly listed tokens, projects with high locked supply, or those with ongoing incentive emissions.
Make decisions around information, portfolio size, and timing.
Over the past year, two key metrics have drawn attention: the FDV-to-circulating market cap ratio and the impact of unlock schedules on volatility.
Case Study Examples (for illustration only):
Practical observation method: On Gate or major tracking sites, check each token’s “total supply,” “circulating supply,” and “unlock schedule.” Track two metrics—FDV/circulating cap multiple and percentage of new tokens unlocking over six months—to identify high-risk candidates.
FDV values “total inventory,” while market cap focuses on “stock on shelves.”
FDV uses total token supply to reflect theoretical maximum value after all tokens are unlocked; market cap uses only currently circulating tokens, making it a better indicator of present supply-demand dynamics. Neither metric is universally superior—they answer different questions.
Comparison Example: Price $2, total supply 1 billion, circulating supply 100 million—FDV is $2 billion, market cap is $200 million. If another 200 million unlock over the next year at constant prices, market cap rises to $600 million while FDV remains unchanged—showing how increasing circulation affects short-term valuation.
Usage tips: Use FDV for long-term project size comparisons; use market cap for short-term liquidity and volatility assessment. For new listings or high-lockup projects, monitor both metrics—especially the FDV/market cap ratio and unlock schedule.
Market cap reflects current market conditions, while FDV reveals potential dilution risks. Market cap = current price × circulating supply; it can be inflated easily. FDV = current price × total supply; it factors in all future tokens and better anticipates long-term investment risk. Both should be referenced before investing—projects with low market cap but extremely high FDV warrant extra caution.
This highlights a project’s token release strategy. Many projects initially release only a small portion of tokens to the market while locking up large allocations for teams, investors, or ecosystem funds—gradually unlocking over time. As these tokens enter circulation, increased supply can pressure prices downward. Projects with much higher FDV than market cap face greater dilution risk; always review unlock schedules and market absorption capacity.
FDV is an important reference but not a sole determinant. Low-FDV projects may appear cheap but could face significant dilution pressure if a high proportion of tokens remain locked. Always consider fundamentals, tokenomics model, team quality, and genuine utility. Use FDV to filter options but research the whitepaper and unlock plans before committing—don’t invest blindly just because FDV seems low.
Compare with leading projects in the same sector. If a project’s FDV is much lower than peers, it could be an opportunity—or signal fundamental issues; if much higher, proceed with caution. Review tokenomics details: total supply, circulating percentage, unlock schedule. As a rule of thumb, projects with less than 20% circulation and an FDV over five times higher than sector peers are high risk.
Most exchanges—including Gate and CoinMarketCap—rank by market cap as it best reflects actual trading volume. However, many platforms also display FDV for reference. On Gate’s token info page, both “Market Cap” and “Fully Diluted Valuation” are shown side-by-side. Both indicators should be considered for a complete view of market position and potential risks.


