Introduction: Investment Comparison of HNT vs FIL
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Helium (HNT) vs Filecoin (FIL) has always been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in crypto assets.
Helium (HNT): Since its launch in 2013, it has gained market recognition for its decentralized wireless network for IoT devices.
Filecoin (FIL): Since its inception in 2017, it has been hailed as a decentralized storage network, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with high global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between HNT vs FIL, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors are most concerned about:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
HNT (Coin A) and FIL (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2021: HNT reached its all-time high of $54.88 on November 13, 2021.
- 2021: FIL hit its all-time high of $236.84 on April 1, 2021.
- Comparative analysis: HNT has fallen from its peak of $54.88 to a current price of $2.417, while FIL has dropped from $236.84 to $2.07.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-15)
- HNT current price: $2.417
- FIL current price: $2.07
- 24-hour trading volume: HNT $2,972,322.84 vs FIL $5,242,380.54
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 10 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of HNT vs FIL
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- HNT: Maximum supply capped at 223 million tokens with halving events every two years. Employs a burn-and-mint equilibrium model where HNT is burned to create Data Credits for network usage.
- FIL: Maximum supply of 2 billion tokens with complex release schedule. Features a dual economic structure where FIL tokens are required for storage services and minting new blocks.
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Both tokens employ halving mechanisms that have historically created cyclical price movements, with scarcity typically driving value increases following supply reduction events.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Filecoin has garnered more institutional interest with backing from notable funds and venture capital firms interested in decentralized storage solutions.
- Enterprise Adoption: Filecoin leads in enterprise storage applications with partnerships in data management and content delivery networks, while Helium focuses on IoT connectivity applications and telecommunications infrastructure.
- Regulatory Attitudes: Both projects face varying regulatory scrutiny across jurisdictions, with decentralized infrastructure projects generally receiving more favorable treatment than pure cryptocurrencies.
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- HNT Technical Upgrades: Expansion beyond IoT into mobile networks (MOBILE) and WiFi (IOT) tokens, creating a multi-token ecosystem supporting different connectivity services.
- FIL Technical Development: Implementation of hierarchical consensus and retrieval markets to enhance network efficiency and functionality in decentralized storage.
- Ecosystem Comparison: Filecoin has developed stronger integration with Web3 applications, while Helium has established partnerships with telecom companies and device manufacturers for real-world connectivity solutions.
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance During Inflation: Both tokens have demonstrated mixed correlation with inflation metrics, with their utility value potentially offering some hedge against traditional currency devaluation.
- Monetary Policy Impact: Interest rate changes affect both networks as infrastructure projects requiring significant capital investment.
- Geopolitical Factors: Growing demand for decentralized infrastructure in regions with internet censorship or limited connectivity options benefits both projects, though with different implementation challenges.
III. Price Predictions for 2025-2030: HNT vs FIL
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- HNT: Conservative $2.24 - $2.41 | Optimistic $2.41 - $2.73
- FIL: Conservative $1.29 - $2.08 | Optimistic $2.08 - $2.95
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- HNT may enter a growth phase, with expected prices of $1.82 - $3.18
- FIL may enter a bullish market, with expected prices of $1.71 - $4.06
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- HNT: Base scenario $3.82 - $3.82 | Optimistic scenario $3.82 - $5.31
- FIL: Base scenario $4.33 - $4.33 | Optimistic scenario $4.33 - $5.46
View detailed price predictions for HNT and FIL
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be construed as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
HNT:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
2.72669 |
2.413 |
2.24409 |
0 |
| 2026 |
3.597783 |
2.569845 |
1.4905101 |
6 |
| 2027 |
3.17632842 |
3.083814 |
1.81945026 |
27 |
| 2028 |
3.9751904367 |
3.13007121 |
2.1284484228 |
29 |
| 2029 |
4.0855254468525 |
3.55263082335 |
2.8776309669135 |
46 |
| 2030 |
5.308518607790737 |
3.81907813510125 |
2.176874537007712 |
58 |
FIL:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
2.9465 |
2.075 |
1.2865 |
0 |
| 2026 |
3.0129 |
2.51075 |
1.5817725 |
21 |
| 2027 |
4.05988275 |
2.761825 |
1.7123315 |
33 |
| 2028 |
4.12713318875 |
3.410853875 |
2.62635748375 |
64 |
| 2029 |
4.8996915914375 |
3.768993531875 |
1.92218670125625 |
82 |
| 2030 |
5.461271627686875 |
4.33434256165625 |
4.204312284806562 |
109 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: HNT vs FIL
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- HNT: Suitable for investors focused on IoT connectivity and telecommunications infrastructure
- FIL: Suitable for investors interested in decentralized storage solutions and Web3 applications
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: HNT: 40% vs FIL: 60%
- Aggressive investors: HNT: 55% vs FIL: 45%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- HNT: Vulnerability to IoT market fluctuations and competition from traditional telecom providers
- FIL: Exposure to fluctuations in the decentralized storage market and competition from centralized cloud storage providers
Technical Risks
- HNT: Scalability issues, network stability during rapid growth
- FIL: Mining power concentration, potential security vulnerabilities in smart contracts
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may impact both differently, with potential for stricter oversight on decentralized infrastructure projects
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- HNT advantages: Unique position in IoT connectivity, expanding into mobile and WiFi networks
- FIL advantages: Strong institutional backing, established presence in decentralized storage market
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for FIL due to its broader market presence
- Experienced investors: Explore a strategic mix of both, leveraging HNT's growth potential and FIL's established ecosystem
- Institutional investors: Evaluate both for portfolio diversification, with emphasis on FIL for its current institutional adoption
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between HNT and FIL in terms of their use cases?
A: HNT focuses on decentralized wireless networks for IoT devices, expanding into mobile and WiFi connectivity. FIL specializes in decentralized storage solutions and has stronger integration with Web3 applications.
Q2: How do the supply mechanisms of HNT and FIL differ?
A: HNT has a maximum supply of 223 million tokens with halving events every two years, using a burn-and-mint equilibrium model. FIL has a maximum supply of 2 billion tokens with a complex release schedule and a dual economic structure for storage services and block minting.
Q3: Which token has shown better performance in terms of price history?
A: Both tokens have experienced significant drops from their all-time highs. HNT peaked at $54.88 in November 2021 and is currently at $2.417, while FIL reached $236.84 in April 2021 and is now at $2.07.
Q4: How does institutional adoption compare between HNT and FIL?
A: FIL has garnered more institutional interest, particularly in enterprise storage applications and partnerships with data management firms. HNT has focused more on partnerships with telecom companies and device manufacturers for IoT connectivity.
Q5: What are the long-term price predictions for HNT and FIL by 2030?
A: For HNT, the base scenario predicts $3.82 - $3.82, with an optimistic scenario of $3.82 - $5.31. For FIL, the base scenario is $4.33 - $4.33, with an optimistic scenario of $4.33 - $5.46.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in HNT and FIL?
A: HNT risks include vulnerability to IoT market fluctuations and competition from traditional telecom providers. FIL faces risks from fluctuations in the decentralized storage market and competition from centralized cloud storage providers. Both are subject to regulatory risks and technical challenges.
Q7: Which token is considered a better buy for different types of investors?
A: For new investors, a balanced approach with a slight preference for FIL is suggested due to its broader market presence. Experienced investors might consider a strategic mix of both. Institutional investors may evaluate both for portfolio diversification, with an emphasis on FIL for its current institutional adoption.