Introduction: FLUID vs IMX Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between FLUID and IMX has been a topic that investors cannot ignore. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different cryptocurrency asset positioning.
FLUID (FLUID): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition as a lending protocol under the multi-chain DeFi management platform Instadapp.
Immutable (IMX): Since its inception, it has been hailed as the second layer (L2) expansion solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering instant transactions, large-scale scalability, and zero gas fees for minting and trading.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between FLUID and IMX, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical ecosystems, and future predictions, while attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
FLUID (Coin A) and IMX (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: FLUID reached its all-time high of $11 on September 24, 2025, and subsequently dropped to its all-time low of $2.017 on October 10, 2025.
- 2021: IMX reached its all-time high of $9.52 on November 26, 2021, showing significant price volatility.
- Comparative Analysis: In the recent market cycle, FLUID experienced a sharp decline from its peak of $11 to a low of $2.017, while IMX has seen a long-term downtrend from its 2021 high, reaching a low of $0.334412 on October 11, 2025.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-16)
- FLUID current price: $3.62
- IMX current price: $0.3793
- 24-hour trading volume: FLUID $903,270.66586 vs IMX $245,741.223733
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 10 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of FLUID vs IMX
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
- FLUID: Fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, with 50% allocated for public sale and ecosystem incentives
- IMX: Maximum supply of 2 billion tokens, with distribution across ecosystem development, project development, and community rewards
- 📌 Historical pattern: Tokens with fixed supply like FLUID tend to be more scarce, while IMX's larger but capped supply focuses on supporting ecosystem growth and development.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional holdings: IMX has gained more institutional recognition with partnerships with major game studios and brands including GameStop, TikTok, and Disney
- Enterprise adoption: IMX has established stronger market position with over 200 projects building on its platform, while FLUID focuses on institutional liquidity aggregation
- Regulatory attitudes: Both operate in evolving regulatory environments, with IMX demonstrating stronger compliance frameworks through established partnerships
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- FLUID technical upgrades: AI-powered liquidity aggregation platform focusing on cross-chain liquidity provision
- IMX technical development: Zero-knowledge proof technology enabling gas-free NFT minting and trading with carbon-neutral operations
- Ecosystem comparison: IMX has a more mature ecosystem with established gaming and NFT applications, while FLUID is developing its liquidity network across DeFi applications
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance during inflation: Neither token has a long enough market history to definitively assess inflation resistance
- Macroeconomic monetary policy: Both tokens face similar challenges from interest rate environments affecting the broader crypto market
- Geopolitical factors: IMX's global gaming focus potentially provides wider geographical distribution of use cases compared to FLUID's institutional focus
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: FLUID vs IMX
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- FLUID: Conservative $2.79 - $3.62 | Optimistic $3.62 - $5.25
- IMX: Conservative $0.21 - $0.38 | Optimistic $0.38 - $0.48
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- FLUID may enter a growth phase, with estimated prices ranging from $2.71 to $5.47
- IMX may enter a growth phase, with estimated prices ranging from $0.31 to $0.59
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- FLUID: Base scenario $5.75 - $6.85 | Optimistic scenario $6.85 - $9.45
- IMX: Base scenario $0.40 - $0.71 | Optimistic scenario $0.71 - $0.89
View detailed price predictions for FLUID and IMX
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. These predictions should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
FLUID:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
5.249 |
3.62 |
2.7874 |
0 |
| 2026 |
5.986575 |
4.4345 |
4.25712 |
22 |
| 2027 |
5.471064375 |
5.2105375 |
2.7094795 |
43 |
| 2028 |
5.98169705 |
5.3408009375 |
3.578336628125 |
47 |
| 2029 |
8.038973571125 |
5.66124899375 |
2.94384947675 |
56 |
| 2030 |
9.45315356976375 |
6.8501112824375 |
5.7540934772475 |
89 |
IMX:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.478296 |
0.3796 |
0.20878 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.63484304 |
0.428948 |
0.22305296 |
13 |
| 2027 |
0.585085072 |
0.53189552 |
0.3138183568 |
40 |
| 2028 |
0.77630151144 |
0.558490296 |
0.45237713976 |
47 |
| 2029 |
0.7608313302408 |
0.66739590372 |
0.4738510916412 |
75 |
| 2030 |
0.885500885055696 |
0.7141136169804 |
0.399903625509024 |
88 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: FLUID vs IMX
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- FLUID: Suitable for investors focused on DeFi liquidity solutions and cross-chain applications
- IMX: Suitable for investors interested in NFT and gaming ecosystem growth
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: FLUID: 30% vs IMX: 70%
- Aggressive investors: FLUID: 60% vs IMX: 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-token portfolio diversification
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- FLUID: Volatility due to relatively lower liquidity and market cap
- IMX: Exposure to fluctuations in NFT and gaming market trends
Technical Risk
- FLUID: Scalability, network stability across multiple chains
- IMX: Dependence on Ethereum ecosystem, potential Layer 2 competition
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may impact both tokens differently, with IMX potentially facing more scrutiny due to its focus on NFTs and gaming
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- FLUID advantages: AI-powered liquidity aggregation, focus on institutional DeFi applications
- IMX advantages: Established partnerships, zero gas fees for NFT transactions, carbon-neutral operations
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider IMX for its more established ecosystem and partnerships
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach, allocating to both FLUID and IMX based on risk tolerance
- Institutional investors: Evaluate FLUID for its institutional liquidity solutions and IMX for its potential in the NFT and gaming sectors
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between FLUID and IMX?
A: FLUID is a lending protocol under the Instadapp DeFi platform, focusing on AI-powered liquidity aggregation across chains. IMX is a Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering zero-gas fees for minting and trading NFTs.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance recently?
A: As of November 16, 2025, FLUID is priced at $3.62, while IMX is at $0.3793. FLUID has shown higher volatility, reaching an all-time high of $11 in September 2025 before declining, while IMX has been in a long-term downtrend since its 2021 high.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of FLUID and IMX compare?
A: FLUID has a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, with 50% allocated for public sale and ecosystem incentives. IMX has a maximum supply of 2 billion tokens, distributed across ecosystem development, project development, and community rewards.
Q4: Which token has stronger institutional adoption?
A: IMX has gained more institutional recognition with partnerships with major game studios and brands including GameStop, TikTok, and Disney. It has over 200 projects building on its platform, while FLUID focuses on institutional liquidity aggregation.
Q5: What are the long-term price predictions for FLUID and IMX?
A: By 2030, FLUID is predicted to range from $5.75 to $9.45 in optimistic scenarios, while IMX is expected to range from $0.40 to $0.89. However, these predictions are subject to market volatility and should not be considered financial advice.
Q6: How should investors allocate their portfolio between FLUID and IMX?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to FLUID and 70% to IMX, while aggressive investors might allocate 60% to FLUID and 40% to IMX. The specific allocation should be based on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q7: What are the main risks associated with investing in FLUID and IMX?
A: FLUID faces risks related to volatility due to lower liquidity and market cap, as well as scalability across multiple chains. IMX is exposed to fluctuations in NFT and gaming market trends and potential competition in the Layer 2 ecosystem. Both tokens may be impacted by evolving regulatory environments.