VEETOR

Seeing sentiment rotating on an old product, even though there haven’t been major structural changes at protocol level These are experts - they know this isn’t sustainable, yet they continue anyway Why? This is exactly why a DAO is inevitable. Some founders lack good advisors

When scarcity hits full force, people won’t want to share what they built for free We’ll see way more premium stuff and the average person will be in trouble

Remote jobs are shrinking and AI is taking over everything If you can’t build something that makes money for you, you’re in trouble

Wow Saw this an realized I spoke about it just few days ago:

If you’re stuck on what to learn or venture into right now I’d say look into the future. What might be useful when blockchain becomes legal worldwide and traditional banks begin to evolve. They’ll need: - Blockchain Risk Analyst - Digital Asset Compliance Officer - Crypto Ops

UX is one of crypto’s biggest unsolved problems, delaying mass adoption AI is moving fast and solutions are shipping constantly but most crypto projects still struggle with usability, privacy, and friction Some projects I’ve discovered and use that are already tackling this:

What print money for y’all this days ? Asking for a friend

Yes! Abstraction isn’t enough Agreed, making crypto simpler to use is great but it didn’t solve the deeper problem Let me explain… Intents don’t break when you express them. They break during execution Think of it like ordering food on Uber Eats/Chowdeck. You place the order

Next I’m looking into execution latency and how preconfirmations fit into this If you enjoy this series so far, pls like and share 🫡

Intents did make crypto simpler - until they didn’t Turns out every protocol that supports intents defines them differently Different formats, different constraints, and even different execution rules. And now we’ve created a new fragmentation problem If you’re a solver trying

The Intent Fragmentation Problem - Infograhic

One thing I'm curious about is how does one prove solvers execute correctly? That is where ZK infrastructure comes in but I will dig into that next Tag others solver networks protocols you know, and let's explore

Solver networks keep coming up so I had to figure out what they actually are since I mentioned them in the intents post... honestly they’re simpler than they sound When you express an intent like “I want 1000 USDC on Arbitrum,” someone has to actually fulfill that That’s what

A simplified infographics of how Solver Network operates

At exactly the date I posted this, $SOL was at $127+ Now currently sitting at $79 I’ll DCA here (and lower if we get)

I am watching these along side: -Solver network growth -Intent adoption across protocol and whether this stays DeFi-only or expands to other crypto use cases let me know what you think in the comments

a simplified infographics of how intents works

Trying to understand intents today and honestly it’s way simpler than I thought Crypto right now makes you do everything manually You want to swap on Arbitrum but your money’s on Ethereum? You have to bridge it first. Then approve the token. Then swap. Then sign like three

Not calling it a new narrative yet… But historically, when crypto removes big friction , new products usually shows up Under the hood it’s things like: - intent protocols - solver networks - outcome-based execution But users never has to care about any of that, they just say

Damnn! This might reshape how chains get built if it actually catches on Builders are talking about cutting out all the annoying parts Basically moving from: “click → sign → bridge → swap → sign → confirm” to “I want X” And intent based systems broadcast what you