🔥 Recently on-chain trading terminal $Genius @GeniusTerminal trading volume is mainly concentrated on BSC, while Solana ecosystem trading volume share is noticeably lower, showing obvious inter-chain differentiation.

📚 According to public data:
2026-03-09 (weekly data)
EVM trading volume: $556,916,284
Solana trading volume: $22,537,044
Total trading volume: $579,453,328
2026-03-14 (daily data)
EVM trading volume: $146,789,414
Solana trading volume: $6,836,838
Total trading volume: $153,626,252
✨ Due to the project's airdrop activity distribution of a fixed 10 million points weekly, calculated from recent weeks' trading volume, the average cost per point is 0.03-0.08/point (weight allocation varies due to different trading volumes)
From a structural perspective:
EVM (primarily BSC) trading volume accounts for approximately 95%
Solana trading volume accounts for only approximately 4%-5%
This means that currently $Genius core liquidity almost entirely comes from the EVM ecosystem, especially BSC users, while Solana users' trading depth contribution remains extremely limited.
From a market structure perspective, this phenomenon may be related to several factors:
Apart from CZ, as project advisor Yzhilabs' investment generating great market expectations for traders,
1️⃣ BSC users are more sensitive to high-frequency trading and airdrop activities
BSC has always been one of the most active public chains in the on-chain "wash trading ecosystem," with high user participation in trading incentives, airdrop rules and other activities.
2️⃣ EVM wallets and fund migration are more convenient
Large amounts of DeFi funds are already within the EVM system, with low migration costs to Genius.
3️⃣ Solana ecosystem users' habits are concentrated on native DEXs
Platforms like Jupiter and Raydium have already formed strong liquidity, making it difficult for new trading platforms to quickly capture market share.
Genius's trading volume appears to be cross-chain, but in reality remains a "BSC-driven platform."